1509 fps faster is a big increase!My son shoots a .300 UM and I have a .300 Wby. I reload for both. I am not a big fan of his UM as it takes 10 grains+ more powder than my Wby and only shoots 1509 FPS faster. Just my take, but as stated both kill dead and shot placement is what counts.
Was a typo....only 150 fps!!!! I corrected the post.1509 fps faster is a big increase!
This!Both would be fine. If it were me, I would pick the 300win for the following reason;
Ammo is less expensive, both to buy and reload
barrel life is longer in the 300win
300win is plenty of gun for elk, if you need more you'd be better served by the 323 or 338 cartridges
recoil is less, which means you can shoot a lighter rifle and be more comfortable than with the 300rum
in the end, there really isnt that much difference. Get the one you like best and fill the freezer![]()
Same here I wouldn't trade my 300 rum for anything but I also have a $1500 scope on mine makes a big diff on how the gun shot down range with a custom turret 1000 yd is not a problemI have a rem model 700 cdl 300rum and I love it! I have killed elk at 578 yds antelope at 490 and whitetail and muley at over 400. That being said they would have all been just as dead if shot with a win mag. I think the scope is much more important than splitting hairs about the 2 calibers. The ammo availability is a huge factor as I have 2 order specially for the rum and it sux! All that said I wouldn't trade my rum for 2 win mags!
^^This is my sentiments as well. I also shoot the 300 WSM for elk and have never felt under gunned at any sort of practical hunting ranges. If you plan on shooting the rifle a lot, the 300 Win would be the choice for me between the two. WAY cheaper to shoot and you really don't give up all that much performance wise.I'd go with the 300 Win Mag, GREAT elk cartridge. I shoot the 300 WSM for everything which has nearly identical ballistics and uses the short action. It puts the hurt on elk.