Yeti Coolers cuts all ties with NRA

Triple BB

Active Member
Jun 22, 2013
296
16
Wyoming
I have both Rtic and Yeti. I think Rtic is better, but wouldn’t turn down any Yeti products. For you guys wanting to donate yer Yeti coolers, I’ll take’um off yer hands...
 

Never in Doubt

Active Member
Jul 9, 2012
304
0
So this is all just the NRA overreacting to not getting Yeti products for less than the average hunter has to pay?
 

JimP

Administrator
Mar 28, 2016
7,322
8,707
72
Gypsum, Co
So this is all just the NRA overreacting to not getting Yeti products for less than the average hunter has to pay?
Do you think that the NRA purchases these kind of items for themselves?

They are bought with the idea of giving them away as prizes in drawings and or raffles. Which in turn generates money for their programs. So the less that they pay for a item them more money that they can usually generate for the programs, in this case to support youth programs and educational programs nationwide.
 

D_Dubya

Active Member
Aug 8, 2012
470
992
South Texas
Wow, that part “they forced us to cancel orders already in the system” is pretty damning for Yeti. That seems to go far beyond a normal change of business strategy...I’m not going to run out and tannerite my Yeti products, but I won’t be purchasing anymore. For the record I am an NRA Life Member
 
Wow, that part “they forced us to cancel orders already in the system” is pretty damning for Yeti. That seems to go far beyond a normal change of business strategy...I’m not going to run out and tannerite my Yeti products, but I won’t be purchasing anymore. For the record I am an NRA Life Member
Similar to the way the part "they refused to do business with us" is pretty damning to the NRA?

QQ
 
Here's what bothers me at this point. Yeti knows they are not going to win no matter how this goes or how right they may have been, so they are going to lie low and hope this blows over as soon as possible. They don't have much choice. The NRA, on the other hand, has learned that their base will support them regardless of what they do. They do not need to be honest or forthcoming with information, because message boards have erupted with members saying they will support them whether they are right or not. So the NRA has no motivation to bring facts to light. The losers? Those of us who would like to understand what actually happened.

QQ
 

D_Dubya

Active Member
Aug 8, 2012
470
992
South Texas
Similar to the way the part "they refused to do business with us" is pretty damning to the NRA?

QQ[/QUOTE

I could certainly understand and have no issue with them making a decision to eliminate a program that they have determined is no longer a viable and profitable channel for their business model. However, It does seem to me that canceling orders which have already been placed is an aggressive move to disassociate themselves from the NRA. In truth, I believe they should have every right to refuse to sell their product to any vendor/organization they do not wish to, and I can choose to not support companies when they do things I disagree with. Doesn’t make them a bad company or a bad product, just means me and whole lot of like minded folks will be purchasing A different overpriced ice chest next time.
 

NDHunter

Veteran member
Feb 25, 2011
1,166
25
North Dakota
we have already compromised all we ever need to. there are no more laws needing to be passed to restrict law abiding citizens of their rights. there are no more laws needing to be passed to deal with the criminals either.

no one likes seeing innocents gunned down and all would love it to never happen again. but it will and punishing the innocent for the crimes of a few wackjobs will do nothing to end it.


that is what is happening .

as I said above , each can make their own decisions. at least until those who would take our guns decide that's not to be allowed either.


you may compromise your principals if you wish . I will remain an extremist and carry it with pride.
Why can't the NRA make rational statements like this? I agree with some of it and disagree with some but it's at least a thoughtful response and one that can open a dialogue. Part of the point I'm trying to make is that it isn't necessarily what the NRA says, it's how it says it. I know others that have the same opinion. Yes, let's protect the 2nd amendment but don't be raging assholes in the process. People generally don't like raging assholes.

Give an inch and they take a mile. By your statement, I take it you're not an NRA member.
Then don't offer a mile. And no I'm not a member.
 

kidoggy

Veteran member
Apr 23, 2016
9,847
10,860
58
idaho
Why can't the NRA make rational statements like this? I agree with some of it and disagree with some but it's at least a thoughtful response and one that can open a dialogue. Part of the point I'm trying to make is that it isn't necessarily what the NRA says, it's how it says it. I know others that have the same opinion. Yes, let's protect the 2nd amendment but don't be raging assholes in the process. People generally don't like raging assholes.
kidoggy said,


sometimes ,when dealing with raging as..... a raging as..... is required.

or to put it another way, it simply is not possible to have a rational discussion with with those of a liberal mindset.they claim to be rational people but their every action proves this is just not so.



case in point . you are already calling them raging as...... , not exactly a great opening for dialogue .


Then don't offer a mile. And no I'm not a member.
no. but they(we) have allowed many to be taken.
 
Last edited:

kidoggy

Veteran member
Apr 23, 2016
9,847
10,860
58
idaho
we are in a fight for our nation that we have been fighting from the very beginning and it will never end.


conservative values vs liberal values. the two are complete opposites .

for those who care, it is in their best interests to know who they are supporting. for those who don't care , well , live long and prosper, I guess.


Other companies that many people may not be aware of that are anti-hunting and oppose the NRA are:
Coca-Cola, Sarah Lee, Kraft, Burger King, McDonalds, Target, Buffalo Wild Wings, and of course the ones which have recently made the headlines.


do not . I repeat do not take my word for it .if it matters to you ,check em out for yourselves.
 

WapitiBob

Veteran member
Mar 1, 2011
1,385
58
Bend, Orygun
From Past President Marion Hammer..

"YETI severed ties with the NRA and is now engaging in damage control after a backlash from many of its customers. In early March, YETI refused to place a previously negotiated order from NRA-ILA, citing "recent events" as the reason ? a clear reference to the tragedy in Parkland, Florida.

YETI then delivered notice to the NRA Foundation that it was terminating a 7 year agreement and demanded that the NRA remove the YETI name and logo from all NRA digital assets, as well as refrain from using any YETI trademarks in future print material. While YETI is trying to spin the story otherwise, those are the facts. While Yeti can choose to run from the NRA, they can't run from the facts. Whether this is due to the recent cancellation of their IPO from their NYC owners is a question only they can answer."

///////////


"In early March, YETI refused to place a previously negotiated order from NRA-ILA, citing "recent events" as the reason ? a clear reference to the tragedy in Parkland, Florida."

From a former Yeti employee...

"They did not refuse any orders from NRA or Friends of the NRA. However, they did refuse an order from the NRA-ILA. YETI refused this order through our custom shop because they have a policy against marking coolers for political organizations or political affiliations. This policy was put in place in 2016. Since 2016, yeti has rejected more than 50 orders from various political organizations of varying types."

=====

"YETI then delivered notice to the NRA Foundation that it was terminating a 7 year agreement and demanded that the NRA remove the YETI name and logo from all NRA digital assets, as well as refrain from using any YETI trademarks in future print material. While YETI is trying to spin the story otherwise, those are the facts."


In my opinion, the above quoted was the purpose of the letter; to cancel the program and have the participants cease using Yeti intellectual and trademarked property. You could substitute any participant for "NRA" in the above, have your own facts, and have the appearance that your Org was singled out.

As you can see below, clearly the NRA was not singled out.




 
Last edited: