WY Taking a Look at Technlogy Concerning Hunting

Jul 6, 2013
96
0
South Dakota
sure you can all it takes is honesty.
20 years ago I would have been all for a ban of crossbows but now I have first hand experience with not only shooting one at the range but using it in the backcountry. When one side is using emotion and the other side is using experience it's not a debate, it's a beating a dead horse argument and for that reason I am going to bow out of this conversation while it's still my choice and not the moderator's.
 
Last edited:

BuzzH

Very Active Member
Apr 15, 2015
909
952
In a perfect world full of accurate statistics, it would be interesting to overlay this data with deer population or deer densities. A couple percentage point increase in success doesn't seem like much, but when you figure in significantly lower deer populations, it becomes more obvious that archery hunters are getting better at killing.
The data is there, get after it, prove your point or move on.
 

Horsenhike

Very Active Member
Nov 11, 2015
668
0
Eastern SD
20 years ago I would have been all for a ban of crossbows but now I have first hand experience with not only shooting one at the range but using it in the backcountry. When one side is using emotion and the other side is using experience it's not a debate, it's a beating a dead horse argument and for that reason I am going to bow out of this conversation while it's still my choice and not the moderator's.
So before you leave let me ask where you live. I live in South Dakota, and am definitely am on the side of believing they offer significant advantage. Are you on the Eastern side of the state?
 
Jul 6, 2013
96
0
South Dakota
So before you leave let me ask where you live. I live in South Dakota, and am definitely am on the side of believing they offer significant advantage. Are you on the Eastern side of the state?
Was this a trick to get me back?
Lived on the eastern side most of my life but moved west 8 years ago. Have you ever hunted with a crossbow, and I'm not talking road hunting or east river were there are roads every mile, I'm talking wide open and/or mountain terrain? Your welcome to come out to the Hills this summer and we will go hiking and I will even let you carry my son's crossbow all day.
 
Last edited:

Gr8bawana

Veteran member
Aug 14, 2014
2,670
604
Nevada
Let me ask this question again since none of the more vocal crossbow proponents responded the first time.

Would you be willing to use your crossbow during a crossbow only season if that was the only season you could hunt? No being able to hunt later in the year with a muzzle loader and then a rifle if you were unsuccessful with a crossbow.
Plus those tags for a crossbow season would have to be taken from the other tag pools. I doubt those other hunters will be happy with less opportunity in order to make you happy.
 

JM77

Member
Apr 25, 2016
104
33
Casper, Wyoming
You should do a comparison to see how other western states that limit crossbow use and what their success rates are to Wyoming's.
A quick check for Utah shows for 2015(the most current year in report) elk archery success as follows:
General season statewide 14.3%
Limited entry statewide 32.1 %

In comparison for Wyoming 2015 archery elk success:
Statewide 9.4% (includes all archery combined)
Limited quota type 9 statewide 22.6%

I realize this is only one comparison and one year, but based on harvest reports for Wyoming over ten years, archery type 9 success statewide did not exceed 32.3% and averaged 25.8 %

This comparison to Utah could add credibility to a report I read a year or so ago that claimed adding crossbows to archery season did not increase harvest success. Unfortunately, I have no reference to find that report.
 

highplainsdrifter

Very Active Member
May 4, 2011
703
128
Wyoming
Let me ask this question again since none of the more vocal crossbow proponents responded the first time.

Would you be willing to use your crossbow during a crossbow only season if that was the only season you could hunt? No being able to hunt later in the year with a muzzle loader and then a rifle if you were unsuccessful with a crossbow.
Plus those tags for a crossbow season would have to be taken from the other tag pools. I doubt those other hunters will be happy with less opportunity in order to make you happy.
For the past five years or so, I have hunted with a crossbow during a general elk archery season (no tag limits). I have not hunted during rifle season even in years that I did not get an elk during archery, but that was my choice. I would be against an "either or" season. I would also be against a separate season for crossbows. They are archery equipment, and should be allowed during archery season which where I hunt is a full month!
 

highplainsdrifter

Very Active Member
May 4, 2011
703
128
Wyoming
A quick check for Utah shows for 2015(the most current year in report) elk archery success as follows:
General season statewide 14.3%
Limited entry statewide 32.1 %

In comparison for Wyoming 2015 archery elk success:
Statewide 9.4% (includes all archery combined)
Limited quota type 9 statewide 22.6%

I realize this is only one comparison and one year, but based on harvest reports for Wyoming over ten years, archery type 9 success statewide did not exceed 32.3% and averaged 25.8 %

This comparison to Utah could add credibility to a report I read a year or so ago that claimed adding crossbows to archery season did not increase harvest success. Unfortunately, I have no reference to find that report.
JM77...I think the Game and Fish Department should hire you! You have provided more data in the past few hours than the Game and Fish Department did in their White Paper that calls for banning crossbows.
 

BuzzH

Very Active Member
Apr 15, 2015
909
952
I'm simply raising a question, not even trying trying to prove any point with this post. You don't need to be an ass
No, you are trying to prove a point without bringing any facts to back up your claim, re-read your post.

Exactly what the WYGF did...shot from the hip making wild claims while looking for a problem to justify their solution.
 

Horsenhike

Very Active Member
Nov 11, 2015
668
0
Eastern SD
Was this a trick to get me back?
Lived on the eastern side most of my life but moved west 8 years ago. Have you ever hunted with a crossbow, and I'm not talking road hunting or east river were there are roads every mile, I'm talking wide open and/or mountain terrain? Your welcome to come out to the Hills this summer and we will go hiking and I will even let you carry my son's crossbow all day.
No. This was a trick to try to get somebody let me shoot their Ravin. :D
 

CrimsonArrow

Very Active Member
Feb 21, 2011
854
362
Minnesota
No, you are trying to prove a point without bringing any facts to back up your claim, re-read your post.

Exactly what the WYGF did...shot from the hip making wild claims while looking for a problem to justify their solution.
My only claim in the last post is that archery hunters are getting better at killing. Would anyone argue that? I mean anyone besides you.
 

jtm307

Active Member
Jan 12, 2016
165
6
Wyoming
The technological difference between a crossbow and a compound bow is much smaller than the technological difference between a compound bow and a recurve/longbow.
 

BuzzH

Very Active Member
Apr 15, 2015
909
952
My only claim in the last post is that archery hunters are getting better at killing. Would anyone argue that? I mean anyone besides you.
With the claim you made in your first post, trying to tie deer density and over-all population with success rates proving that archery hunters are getting better at killing?

Yes, I would argue that, all day long, in particular without any facts to support the claim.

Would I argue that, in general, archery hunters have become better at killing because of technology...no, I wouldn't argue that point.
 

johnsd16

Active Member
Mar 16, 2014
353
4
N Idaho
Not to interject a too off the wall point, but any “statistics” that are published or being thrown around without other analytic context (median, SD, IQR, etc) are not interperatable. We have no clue if there is reporting bias on any level. Do we know what percentage of tag holders are responding? Do we know if crossbow hunters and vertical bow hunters respond to surveys at the same rate? Do we know if R and NR respond at the same rate? Do we know if type 9 and type 1 tag holders respond d at the same rate. Do we know if successful and unsuccessful hunters respond in similar patterns? I gather that we don’t. Even if the statistics are the “best we have” they can still be garbage. Are these success rates based off survey of 10% of tagholders?? 40%? 80%? I’ve done the Montana survey and looked at their stats, total joke. In the Midwest there are way more hunters and way more animals killed and they do mandatory reporting. IMO the western states have a more complex puzzle to manage with more species and more diverse ecosystems, you would think detailed data would be MORE important to them.
 

JM77

Member
Apr 25, 2016
104
33
Casper, Wyoming
Not to interject a too off the wall point, but any ?statistics? that are published or being thrown around without other analytic context (median, SD, IQR, etc) are not interperatable. We have no clue if there is reporting bias on any level. Do we know what percentage of tag holders are responding? Do we know if crossbow hunters and vertical bow hunters respond to surveys at the same rate? Do we know if R and NR respond at the same rate? Do we know if type 9 and type 1 tag holders respond d at the same rate. Do we know if successful and unsuccessful hunters respond in similar patterns? I gather that we don?t. Even if the statistics are the ?best we have? they can still be garbage. Are these success rates based off survey of 10% of tagholders?? 40%? 80%? I?ve done the Montana survey and looked at their stats, total joke. In the Midwest there are way more hunters and way more animals killed and they do mandatory reporting. IMO the western states have a more complex puzzle to manage with more species and more diverse ecosystems, you would think detailed data would be MORE important to them.
To answer your question about harvest surveys, I can't speak about Utah, but those in the Wyo G&F have explained in detail, not only to me, but to the whole mule deer initiative group I am a member of, the process of hunters surveys. They stress that accuracy is extremely important and feel they are within 95%. I haven't seen any evidence, over many years, that their explanation is anything but true.
 

mallardsx2

Veteran member
Jul 8, 2015
3,923
3,243
Just checking in.

Am I still the bad guy 17 pages of posts later?

It appears that you have moved on.

lol