mnhoundman
Veteran member
Just saying I don't agree with it, not gonna argue.
Both buy a lisence, both fishing, shouldn't matter
Both buy a lisence, both fishing, shouldn't matter
Last edited:
Isn't that moral relativism, then who decides whose morals we are going to use?Ethics and morals are two different things...
If party hunting is legal in a certain area and party hunting is the method of take used then "ethically" the rules were followed.
"Morally", one can have a personal objection to party hunting because they judge right and wrong differently.
valid pointwhat about the opposite way. 1 tag and 10 spotters. I am not sure which one is worse to me.
Good point Tim.what about the opposite way. 1 tag and 10 spotters. I am not sure which one is worse to me.
Evidently you have never seen a Utah bison hunt on the Henry Mountains. I would be willing to bet that there is at least 20:1 spotters to tag down there on most of the hunts. The last one that I was on we had a 9:1 ratio but the next camp over was closer to 30:1.what about the opposite way. 1 tag and 10 spotters. I am not sure which one is worse to me.
How do you sort it out when you're running 20 guys in a goose pit?But then the law is the law. If I catch 3 fish when the limit is only 2 I have broken the law, even if I give you to my partner who has only caught 1. The law is the law and if they are watching you then you deserve a ticket if you brought 3 into the boat and gave one to your fishing buddy.
I believe that I said in a earlier post that birds are a tough one. But someone needs to claim it and once there is a limit of birds in one persons pile then at least one person shouldn't be shooting at geese anymore. Then as other limits are filled others should stop shooting.How do you sort it out when you're running 20 guys in a goose pit?
The guides shoot their limits first!! J/kHow do you sort it out when you're running 20 guys in a goose pit?