I am one step closer to pulling the trigger on Option 2
Today, I spent a couple hours drafting a letter to my home state of Oregon about a proposed change, that went up on their website yesterday. They are making a proposal that will basically nullify 22 points that I've built for a top 3 mule deer tag that I should draw in about 5 years. The proposal came out two weeks after the application deadline and indicates it may go into effect next year. Moves like these that make me super leery on tags where I can draw a great tag now, but may still have a 15+ year wait for the best tag even in the max point pool. The 13B rifle tag is in that category. There is a large backlog of max point applicants and quite a few with one less than max that just need to travel out to Arizona to get their hunter's safety point.
Earlier this year AZ was proposing a Super Point idea where one point could be bought for ONE specie. I have 30 for antelope, 30 for sheep (after this year's draw), max for deer, and 21 for elk. Hmmm, which tag would I buy the Super Point for if that happened? Probably sheep. I would then start falling behind on the other species as other applicants bought Super points for those species. Since I am in the bonus pass for deer, one two to years from the bonus pass for sheep, I have a couple year advantage on antelope and a year or two buffer on a good elk tag, a concept like a Super point would mess that up in a hurry. Though the Super Point may never go into effect, but proposals like that are devastating when you are highly invested. Once in a while they stick like a few years ago when the nonresident bonus pass in AZ was limited to half the nonresident tags. Good for low point applicants, devastating when you are close you the tag you've paid into for decades.