Search results

Naw, it's all good, CPW said they won't issue the wolves a Park Pass...

Thanks & GREAT JOB to all the guys who remove spam !!

I'm just telling you what they said... Sounds odd to me too.

Here's this month's link & map... https://cpw.state.co.us/learn/Pages/Wolves-Activity-Map.aspx Note: During the last CPW Meeting they said non of these Reintroduced wolves have left Colorado.

I'm watching it CC but it's more like I'm watching a car wreck that you can't take your eye's off-of than I'm watching and hoping for a good outcome. You can bet Polis will nomiate someone who will support his liberal agengas rather rather someone who's actually qualified. Our sytem has been a...

^^ sounds correct to me.

Well said Hilltop

No need to cherry pick, that is EXACTLY what you meant. Colorado V said Colorado should have a 72/25 split across the board. You believe that makes residents "greedy" (your word), which implies you think nonresidents should receive MORE than 25% (which is just wrong). The rest of your...

Ummmm ... wow ... no. Simply not true ... nice try though. Yes, you still have an entitled attitude. You believe you should get more than 25% of the licenses, across the entire draw system, in a state where you do not even live. Why would you ever think that? They are Colorado's licenses...

This is just another verse of your same old song ... you want licenses which you are not entitled to. Coloado V is right. 75/25 is the most generous split of any Western state ... it should at least be applied across the board. As he said "... all licenses, second draw, returned tags...

Concluding with “Sigh” … Overly dramatic much? Histrionic maybe? Take it easy, ok… First of all, this Forum is awesome. It allows people like you and me to discuss things (semi cordially) and get our thoughts out there for others to consider. I may not agree with you but that has nothing...

A lot of residents would CC. When they allowed public comments during the Commissioner’s meeting virtually every single person (and they allowed a couple hours of comments) said they wanted to reduce crowding by Nonresidents and increase Resident hunting opportunities.

I lived in many places around the world before I decided to live in Colorado, partly because I wanted to hunt here. So yes, as a resident I have a right to want more of the tags set aside for the folks who live here. I moved here so I could hunt here and have something to say about how CPW does...

^^ You pretty much summed it up.

Greedy? That's an odd statement since Colorado is by far more generous with nonresident tags than any other western state. And as for 75/25 being "greedy" ... you may be wishing for that once all the westeren states get done shifting to 90/10.

^^ One non-resident called in, and he actually said that he thought non-residents were getting too many tags compared to residence, which seem very odd. Many of the residents weren’t complaining about the actual number of tags (some were), but rather how Colorado seems to favor nonresidents...

As I mentioned in my notes, the Commission is considering 75-25 but just for the primary draw, which actually takes some tags away from residents since that will eliminate the 80/20 split they recently approved for “high demand” tags … which hasn’t even gone into effect yet. When it came time...

^ You may be right, but while I remember some discussion and questions about this idea, I can’t remember any real opposition. It probably has a good chance of being approved

Well, I listened to the entire Commissioner’s meeting for two days and didn’t witness what you’re describing. The Commissioners understand the issues and they seem genuinely interested in trying to solve them. I don’t always like what the Commissioners do but I liked what I heard during this...

That’s quite the rant Jim, but I’m sorry, I don’t know what your point is.