Amen to that and that's something else that the brothers need to look into. There can't be that many processors in that area and it should be easy to find out if the GW took it in to one and when! If it wasn't, the GW should have some serious explaining to do and maybe even have a warrant served to search his private property in case he took it for himself. The guy filming for Wardens should also be interviewed to get his end of the story and I would not let up on this aspect of the case either if it was me! The Dept. needs to be put on the coals for this whole debacle!
In several letters and statements we have noted the fact that the meat of my bull (not fully dressed out when loaded into the wardens truck) must have gone bad given the time line from the kill to when we saw the warden's truck last. As my brother put it, There isn't a processor in the state who would have taken it. If anything, it was processed at the land fill. Here is one of Warrens statements:
Warren L - December 10, 2014 3:17 pm A few facts not reported follow.
My wife and I own 320 acres directly across the highway from where the elk was dropped. We raise alfalfa and some cattle. We never had elk until the wolves were reintroduced, but now have anywhere between 30 and 200 come across the highway from the river bottom each night to trash our fences to graze on our alfalfa. There were no other hunters in the area, but our neighbors were hunting on the same river bottom section about 3/4 of a mile to the south. After Jim shot the bull the rest of the bunch disappeared into the timber. We soon heard one other shot in the distance to the west. I walked back to the road to go get a tractor to pull the elk, and met the game warden who was parked on the right-of-way about 1/4 mile from the elk. He asked if I had shot the elk, and asked to see my license when I said that my out of state brother had shot it. After seeing my intact license he told me that Jim would likely lose the elk because they had witnessed him tag it but not until 21 minutes after shooting it. He and the cameraman had watched and filmed the whole thing from behind some trees about 1/4 mile away. I went to get the tractor and the warden & cameraman walked down to Jim & the elk. He announced that he was a game warden and told Jim to cut the tag off and give it to him. He checked and found that the tag was completely and correctly tagged and then told Jim he would likely lose the elk because he did not tag it "immediately", but would meet us at the ranch house later. When he did so, in response to Jim's question, he said the rack would be held in an evidence room and the meat would be processed and frozen pending the results in court, should Jim elect to plead not guilty. When Jim asked him what "immediately" meant he replied "It's in the dictionary, you can look it up", obviously playing to the camera. We saw the elk still folded up in the back of his truck well past noon and still an hour away from Bozeman, in 71 degree weather. Three days later the warden's supervisor told the county attorney that the meat had already been processed and given to charity contrary to what the warden said would happen to it. I don't buy that story, there is not a processor in the state that would accept the elk after that delay in hot weather. The warden should be charged with wasting a game animal.
WE NEED YOUR HELP. PLEASE SEND YOUR STATEMENTS TO:
MR. JEFF HAGENER, DIRECTOR
MONTANA FISH, WILDLIFE $ PARKS
P.O. BOX 200701
HELENA, MT 59620-0701
Today I heard back via email from Dan Vermillion, chairman with FWP from Livingston. After reading my 6 page statement he said;
"James,
Thank you for your note regarding your experience elk hunting in Montana. I have read your letter, as well as the different articles in the paper. I am not sure what happened that day, but I am sincerely sorry that your experience with Department staff was so problematic". REALLY? Not sure what happened huh?