judges ruling on Wyoming and wolves

A

Againstthewind

Very Active Member
Mar 25, 2014
973
2
Upton, WY
Hilltop said:
Fingers crossed....
Click to expand...
fingers crossed, but not holding my breath. I thought that the Bugle article the subject said that only 40 some were killed in the predator region. I had the same thoughts as lib., Wyoming was a hold out to get the management the way they wanted it, and once that went through it was supposed to be all good as long as there were 100 wolves minimum or 10 breeding pairs or something like that. I don't know where they got the 200+killed figure, I don't think the Game and fish numbers match up to that. The old SOS was in place before they would even admit that the wolves and grizz were outside the park. All stopping hunting wolves will do is push it underground. I think having some management over it is better.
 
Musket Man

Musket Man

Veteran member
Jul 20, 2011
6,457
0
colfax, wa
This is the trouble right here.

"Jamie Rappaport Clark, president and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife, is a former director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service."

She was the usfws director that did alot of things peoples backs that should have never happened and got the wolves introduced in the first place. Then she went to destroyers of wildlife and has been suing ever since because she knows how the system works and how to get EAJ money and make alot of money off of the wolf disaster she created.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom