Great Lakes Wolves Back On ESA List

Topgun 30-06

Banned
Jun 12, 2013
1,353
1
Allegan, MI
By John Flesher, Associated Press5:52 p.m. EST December 19, 2014

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. — A federal judge on Friday threw out an Obama administration decision to remove the gray wolf population in the western Great Lakes region from the endangered species list — a decision that will ban further wolf hunting and trapping in three states.

The order affects wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin, where the combined population is estimated at around 3,700. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service dropped federal protections from those wolves in 2012 and handed over management to the states.

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., ruled Friday the removal was “arbitrary and capricious” and violated the federal Endangered Species Act.

Unless overturned, her decision will block the states from scheduling additional hunting and trapping seasons for the predators. All three have had at least one hunting season since protections were lifted, while Minnesota and Wisconsin also have allowed trapping.

More than 1,500 Great Lakes wolves have been killed since federal protections were removed, said Jonathan Lovvorn, senior vice president of the Humane Society of the United States, which filed a lawsuit that prompted Howell’s ruling.

“We are pleased that the court has recognized that the basis for the delisting decision was flawed, and would stop wolf recovery in its tracks,” Lovvorn said.



U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman Gavin Shire said the agency was disappointed and would confer with the U.S. Department of Justice and the states about whether to appeal.

“The science clearly shows that wolves are recovered in the Great Lakes region, and we believe the Great Lakes states have clearly demonstrated their ability to effectively manage their wolf populations,” Shire said. “This is a significant step backward.”

Wolf advocates applauded the ruling Friday.

“We filed the lawsuit to relist the Great Lakes population of wolves,” said Jill Fritz, coordinator of Michigan’s Humane Society of the United States. “It was based on the assertion that the Great Lakes states had proven they could not responsibly manage wolves when they were delisted in January 2012.”

Jodi Habush Sinykin, an attorney for Midwest Environmental Advocates, which supports science-based wildlife management, said the decision should serve as a clear signal of caution to people who would destroy the nation’s wolves.

Minnesota Natural Resources Commissioner Tom Landwehr said agency attorneys will study the ruling before determining its effect on state wolf policy.

“On face value we’re very surprised. We didn’t even know it was coming to a conclusion here,” Landwehr said. “It’s an unusual turn of events.”
 

Againstthewind

Very Active Member
Mar 25, 2014
973
2
Upton, WY
The judge in the Wyoming case was Judge Amy Berman Jackson. 3700 wolves? Holy crap! I don't understand this "science based" phrase. Well, good job keeping us informed TG.

Mnhoundman, it was a pretty similar decision in Wyoming, no hunting or trapping.
 
Last edited:

Topgun 30-06

Banned
Jun 12, 2013
1,353
1
Allegan, MI
Is this the same DC judge that relisted wolves in WY? What a bunch of BULL! They will be after MT and ID next......
Nope! They found another Lib Judge to screw us over again and your last statement may not be that far off the way these antis have millions of dollars to spend and there is always a Judge somewhere that will come up with the ruling they're looking for. This one was U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., who ruled Friday the removal was “arbitrary and capricious” and violated the federal Endangered Species Act.
 

Sundowners@5?

Member
Feb 19, 2014
57
7
Northern Wisconsin
"WORDS OF WISDOM" A northern WI beef farmer once told me when I was hunting yotes on his property - Don't even tell yourself you made a "MISTAKE" on one of those big hybrids, but if he's wearing a collar and you turn into me I have a big bottle of CROWN for ya
 

shootbrownelk

Veteran member
Apr 11, 2011
1,535
196
Wyoming
Nope! They found another Lib Judge to screw us over again and your last statement may not be that far off the way these antis have millions of dollars to spend and there is always a Judge somewhere that will come up with the ruling they're looking for. This one was U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., who ruled Friday the removal was “arbitrary and capricious” and violated the federal Endangered Species Act.
Right on the money TopGun, Did you notice that all these liberal, bunny-hugging Judges they find to rule in their favor are from the EAST coast? Always, they cherry-pick Judges based on past rulings. This really sucks. I was planning a wolf hunt in the next year or two....cleverly disguised as an Elk hunt! The Judge in the Wyoming case has probably never been here. Perhaps she flew over Wyoming in an aircraft once or twice, and that automatically qualifys her as a Wildlife biologist. I think that lawsuits over wildlife issues should be filed in the States affected, NOT in Washington D.C.
 

go_deep

Veteran member
Nov 30, 2014
2,650
1,984
Wyoming
I was born and raised in northern Wisconsin all my family still resides there. The deer numbers from around Gordon, WI to the big lake are non-existent not that it's prime deer country, but you use to be able to fill tags now a camp of 6 hunting for 6 of the 9 days of rifle in a antlered only area can't even see a buck. Heck 4 of them never seen a deer and the other 2 guys seen a doe and fawn and that's it, but the wolf sign and pictures of them on trail cameras is up ten full. The wolves are the same reason the Wisconsin elk population in the last 10 years has been at about a .1% growth, because every time one elk gets off by itself it's wolf supper.
 

Musket Man

Veteran member
Jul 20, 2011
6,457
0
colfax, wa
I think that lawsuits over wildlife issues should be filed in the States affected, NOT in Washington D.C.
I agree completely although they did get judge Malloy in Missoula to rule on their side enough times, but atleast it was closer and we could go to the hearings. Not many of us have the time or money to go to DC and I think that is part of why they find judges so far away.
 

minn elk chaser

Active Member
Jan 6, 2014
332
72
I have friends who have hunted in northern Minn. for years and they say the same thing. If you see a deer you have a successful hunt. I think they are finding out that the moose population that use to be good enough to hunt are disappearing also. I live in Central Minn. and the wolfs have started showing up there also because of lack of deer in the northern part of Minn. SSS has always been the rule so keep it up.
 

RICMIC

Veteran member
Feb 21, 2012
2,016
1,796
Two Harbors, Minnesota
The antis have almost unlimited funds. The HSUS has an "endowment fund of approx. 193 million. Less than 1% of the money raised goes to animal shelters. I live in the thick of MN wolf country, on a small lake, 22 miles from the nearest town. I haven't seen a deer in six months or a track in two months. There were four black wolves frolicking around on the lake earlier this week. I have raised my back yard fence to 7' so my dog isn't a snack for them. Appeals courts may rule on this, but the appeals will go on. The congress created the Endangered Species Act, but they need to modify it to make a clear exit strategy.
One man is an army. Two men are an unruly mob.
 

mnhoundman

Veteran member
Oct 25, 2012
1,291
111
Minnesota
So if I am reading the first line correctly, Obama administration decided to remove the wolves, but the judge is who turned it down! Am I correct?
 

Topgun 30-06

Banned
Jun 12, 2013
1,353
1
Allegan, MI
So if I am reading the first line correctly, Obama administration decided to remove the wolves, but the judge is who turned it down! Am I correct?

The Feds removed the Great Lakes wolves from the ESA when they delisted them a couple years ago. MI, WIS, and MN all have separate state plans to manage them just like they are doing in MT and ID. The huggers appealed to that female Judge in DC to have them relisted under the ESA and she ruled in their favor yesterday and put them back on the ESA.