My go to the last few years has been the .300 Win Mag ELD-x, 200 grain precision hunter as my all around gun. Kills elk and deer no problem.
However, Ike talked me into the 6.5 Creedmoor recently...
[/QUOTE
So future pics in the mag will show your new man bun?
Yes I strongly suggest that simply to save some meat. Rapid expansion bullets cause more meat loss in my opinion and also increase your chances of fragments in your meat a long ways from the impact area. They do tend to bang flop deer though if that is #1 priority.So would you guys say a controlled expansion bullet over a high expansion bullet?
My .300 Wby shoot 180 gr Nosler Partitions really well.I've used 180 grn barnes tripple shock for many years in my 300 wby. Pretty hard to beat their performance on impact, not the most accurate bullet out there though.
That's where people need to play around with loads, to find what works best.I've used 180 grn barnes tripple shock for many years in my 300 wby. Pretty hard to beat their performance on impact, not the most accurate bullet out there though.
I have two 300 Wbys, one doesn't like the barnes, the other does. I am going to try Nosler Partitions this year, I already have them but have not taken the time to shoot them yet.My .300 Wby shoot 180 gr Nosler Partitions really well.
Wife.....225 TTSX from .338 WM, Me.....250 TTSX from .375 AI. Sorry..... that’s all we have to hunt with!After reading the June July issue from Eastmans and the article on elk bullets, I was wondering what everyone liked for mule deer? I run federal 180 grain Barnes bullet out of my .300 win. for elk .Just wondering what everyone liked
I have found it hard to match the Weatherby factory ammo ballistics. There is not a lot of reloading data out there that duplicates the factory ammo ballistics. Your method of pulling the bullet and weighing the powder is also what I did. The problem I had when I was first reloading was I could not get the Norma MRP, so I settled on Reloader 22 and had to play around a while. At the time, RL 22 was the slowest burning powder they offered that according to the data I could find, came close to factory ballistics. Now I have just stuck with the loads I developed with RL 22. At some point in the future when I have more time I plan on playing around with some of the newer, slower burning powders.That's where people need to play around with loads, to find what works best.
When I was first sighting in my, 340 I had some factory Weatherby Barnes 225 X bullets and after the first 5 shots with them I looked at the target and thought that I had a couple of fliers but it was still a tight group.
After looking at it closer I saw that the two that I thought were fliers had actually cut through a existing hole.
That settled it for me and I started to duplicate that factory load as close as I could. I even went as far as pulling a bullet out and weighing the powder load.
I now have a load that shoots a sub moa 5 shot group at 250 yards where it is sighted in at, and my best group at that range is just under 1/2 inch with 225 grain TTSX bullets at 3000 fps