- Jul 8, 2015
- 3,912
- 3,227

Corner-crossing defendants move for dismissal of trespass charges - WyoFile
A closely watched case regarding public land presumably locked up by checkerboard ownership should be dismissed, defendants’ attorney argues.

I just pay the Rancher for the privilege of hunting his ranch. Our group has done this for 25 years and we are practically family now. Getting to know how much work and so little returns rancher’s experience will give you a different view on this.There needs to be some sort of understanding that the landowners cannot build obstruction for corner crossing to access our public land as well. If you read within the lawsuit, the landowner mentioned building a bigger fence or obstruction to eliminate the crossing if he loses.
This does not only affect the non-resident but many residents are affected and upset as well.
Doubt if this will work in this case!I just pay the Rancher for the privilege of hunting his ranch. Our group has done this for 25 years and we are practically family now. Getting to know how much work and so little returns rancher’s experience will give you a different view on this.
Buzz, why has the county attorney not filed harassment charges?Here's what I know since I've been involved in it, interviewed a dozen times or more, and talk with the defendants regularly.
The court date has been moved to late April. The elk mountain ranch has filed civil suits against all 4 defendants and the out of touch with reality county attorney has threatened to file title 23 trespass on 3 of the 4 hunters from the previous year.
There has been 5 motions to dismiss filed by the attorneys for the civil and criminal cases.
As to where this ends up, depends on the outcome of all the he cases but we have a strategy for all contingencies.
The way the attorneys have framed this case there are narrow windows to appeal to the USSC and a better avenue to Wyoming supreme court.
The carbon county attorney is also in receipt of formally filed complaints of hunter harassment but has not filed charges.
There is also very likely going to be another case filed with the State attorneys office over illegaly denying access to public lands by elk mountain ranch.
Buckle up...
Yeah they cant give too many opinions as they open themselves up for suits against them. I thought they did tie history and precedence together well which IMO will make some very interesting arguments. Of those, most I see siding with the hunters.I listened to over 3 hours of Randy Newberg's podcast and I don't think I learned much. the attorneys spent all that time on background and really didn't give much in the way of opinion. I think this goes all the way to the US Supreme Court to get settled if the people involved have the money and time.
Call her and ask...because that's a good question.Buzz, why has the county attorney not filed harassment charges?
If us non residents think this is just a Wyoming issue and it wont set precedence IF it goes to the US Supreme Court....well then nuff said.It will be interesting how the fund raising goes post the 90/10 vote. I think fewer non-residents are going to be willing to spend money on the cause based on threads I'm reading on other forums.
Ashley Mayfield DavisCall her and ask...because that's a good question.