Bonecollector
Veteran member
I support most of the statements made including yours Todd. However I would like to see some additional revenue raised by increasing tag prices for rresidents And increase does not need to be drastic but it does need to be realistic and this statement has nothing to do with being a non-resident. Based on your statement of supply in the man in charge of taking care of one of the greatest ecosystems in the world, $50 for a resident elk tag is is not smart business. $100 per resident elk tag would still be a bargain and would double the revenue on said tags and would go along way to supporting what we all love. 25% increase on other resident tags would still be a minor out-of-pocket expense for WY residents but equate to another small boost for the Wyoming fish and game.I'm going to stir the pot here... as a Wyoming resident I don't see the problem with that. The Wyoming Game and Fish Department is charged with managing one of the most dynamic landscapes on the planet with highly sought after game animals found in only a limited geographic zone. Demand far outstrips supply in this case and the job is a tough one... no matter what the department does it is sure to be met with criticism. So, if preference points help generate revenue in a state with fewer than 600K residents and populated by iconic game animals that hunters around the world want to pursue, I guess that's okay with me.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk