Sure....if you are after a 360" or better bull I'd agree with that. How many men though will pass on a solid 325 -330" animal?......Good numbers of those to go around. There are though a lot of units that require "effort to get to the animals".......that produce bigger than average animals. I've been part of two hunts that produced some 340" bulls in a unit that has leftover tags EVERY YEAR. I was just the wrangler running the pack string and glassing.Colorado doesn't have many units that put out much in the way of B&C bulls but it has a lot of units with good size bulls and easy draw.
Colorado has a lot of very good mule deer hunts capable of producing B&C bucks and quite a few that don't take a lot of points. I saw a 30" buck last year in a unit that takes 0 points for 2nd season.
So, the digital magazine will no longer be available on the website? Only through the app? When I go through the app, it tries to charge me for the magazine, despite logging in, and having a subscription..Digital ships this week. You guys will be needing to download the new app as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think that was taken the wrong way. What I meant was I dont' think its worthwhile to build elk points in CO. The good limited entry units take many more points to draw than the value of the hunt - 20+ years to draw a tag, etc. That's knocked on the middle tier units like 76 - point inflation. If I elk hunt in CO it is OTC or on leftovers - yes there is lots of great hunting available, just not worth trying to stockpile points for the most popular units in the state."Takes too many elk points for decent units, just about the same for rifle mule deer."
Ehhhhhhh.....I dont know about that. I think if you compare MRS vs herd objective levels vs herd count totals vs bull to cow ratios vs leftover tags last year vs the limited hunt GMUS vs draw data from last year.......that may paint a slightly different picture. Just my opinion though![]()