What would you buy

elkhunter

New Member
Mar 12, 2011
9
0
I am looking for some good advice. I am going to get some new 10x42 binoculars this year. I only have $500-$600 to spend. For the money, what would you buy?

Thanks
 

Drhorsepower

Veteran member
May 19, 2011
2,225
0
Reno, Nevada, United States
Save your money until you can get a pair of zeiss or Swarovskis. My opinion. I have a pair of leupold golden ring that is in your price range but I wouldnt recommend them unless you were to keep em in your truck. The eye reliefs are not comfortable for long looks and they are always twisting in and out for different reliefs. Kinda heavy also. I wish I would have waited.
 

twp1224

Active Member
Mar 6, 2011
224
1
Central Coast
Vortex has good optics in your price range. I couldn't afford the expensive glass, so I purchased the Vortex Diamondbacks 10x42. They are really good in low light and have not let me down yet. I have looked through them for hours and never had eye fatigue. I'm sure their more expensive $500-$600 range bino's are even better.
 

JNDEER

Active Member
Mar 11, 2011
337
0
Vortex has good optics in your price range. I couldn't afford the expensive glass, so I purchased the Vortex Diamondbacks 10x42. They are really good in low light and have not let me down yet. I have looked through them for hours and never had eye fatigue. I'm sure their more expensive $500-$600 range bino's are even better.
I have Vortex and love them dearly. The Razor's are very good (unless you wear glasses than you have to finagle it a bit).

If I had to do it over again (I baught the Razor's for $550), I would think long and hard about possibley saving the extra $300-$500 to get a pair of Swaro's. I have never looked through a pair, but when EVERYBODY raves about them, that to me says a lot.

If you need a pair of good/decent glass to hold you off for a while why you save for the high end models I would get the Diamondbacks from Vortex (I had these and gave them to my bro when I upgraded) hands down!
 

dito

Active Member
Feb 22, 2011
167
0
Alamosa, CO
I got the Meopta Meostars for $825 shipped. From reading the reviews on Cabelas it sounds like they are pretty close to swaros. I live out in BFN so I've not had the chance to look through swaros. But what I've used of these binos I'm happy with them so far.
 

griz

New Member
Apr 23, 2011
42
0
Albany, Oregon
I have a set of Brunton 10x42 and really like them. The only thing is they are a little heavy but work very well for long periods of glassing!
 

RUTTIN

Veteran member
Feb 26, 2011
1,299
0
Kamas, Utah
I bought a pair of Nikon Monarchs a few years ago, and really liked them. ($300.00) Until I came into some money, and thought I would buy some good glass. Ended up buying Swarovski EL's and wished all of those years of buying sub par binos I would have saved the money and bought good glass from the start. If you really cannot come up with the extra money for top end, I would suggest going some where you can get all the binos in your price range out and look through all of them outside the store at dusk, to see which pair you like the best.
 

Bitterroot Bulls

Veteran member
Apr 25, 2011
2,326
0
Montana
I really love optics. It seems I am always buying, using, or trading some type of optics, especially binoculars. I have owned, or do own many of the binoculars already mentioned in this thread, including Monarchs, Razors, Meostars, and Swaros.

Common advice given in these situations is that one should just save longer and go with an "alpha" European binocular. I agree that the Big Three Euro optics companies are still making the very best of the best.

However, other companies have really closed the gap in performance recently. Particularly, ED binoculars coming out of China, have near-alpha images in a bit less-refined build. I have Zen Ray Zen ED2 binoculars. What I can see through my Swaro SLCneus, I can see through my Zens.

Sometimes saving for years for a $2000 pair of binoculars is impractical, especially when binoculars in the OP's price range are so good. I think $400 to $600 is the "sweet spot" for value with models like the Zens, Vortex Talon HD, Vortex Viper HD, Kruger Caldera, and others available. You pay a lot more for little improvement in performance above this price range.
 

NDHunter

Veteran member
Feb 25, 2011
1,166
25
North Dakota
I think that for a lot of us, it just isn't possible to justify spending $1,000+ on a pair of binoculars. I am young and just starting out trying to accumulate the gear that I will need and already have a long list of stuff. Like a pack, spotting scope and tripod, tent, sleeping bag, sleeping pad, coolers, clothing, and on and on. I agree 100% with buying quality equipment, but if i bought top of the line equipment for just the stuff that I listed, I would easily be looking at close to five grand. Plus, id hate to lose a $1,000 pair of binoculars or have them stolen. Just my two cents.
 

6mm Remington

Very Active Member
Mar 27, 2011
978
49
Western Montana
elkhunter here is my take on this. I personally like the compact binoculars and find that they are so nice to carry that you have them around you neck ALL THE TIME where I've seen my buddy leave his Sworavski 10x42's in the truck just because they were too heavy to carry, even with the nice shoulder harness he has. Instead he would grab his compact binoculars.

Leica Ultravid 10x25 compacts. I love them. They are sharp and clear and I think they work just fine for early morning and late afternoon glassing. I believe I paid just a bit more than $600.00 for mine. Again they are very very good binoculars! Find some in a store and have a salesman go outside with you and look through them for a while. I sure like mine! Good Luck!
David
 

SDbowhunter

Active Member
Feb 21, 2011
163
0
Winner, SD
Those are Leica's though and they are right up there with the Swaro's....I used a pair of Simmons 10x50's for years, and got by just fine, but the longer I used them, the harder it got to look through them. I just didn't know better back then, nobody I was around was interested in bino's that cost more than $100. Its nice to talk about how clear of a picture the Bino's have and in a store its REAL hard to distinguish any difference between a pair of sub par cheapos and high end Euro's BUT what I didn't know but learned from Mike Eastman in his books and then on my own was that the high end bino's were easier on your eyes !!!

After looking through my simmon's and even my dad's nikons (10x50) I can't look through them for more than about 5 mins and I start getting a headache, the better glass is better for your eyes.. so when someone says wait to get better bino's take their advice, you're eyes will thank you in ten years. personally I'd rather spend less on a tent and all the other gear one needs. Ask yourself "how much time do I spend behind my glasses?" If your looking at deer for a minute or less every hour from a treestand then a cheap pair is prob all you need, but if you spend hours behind your glass out west picking apart drainages you will want good binoculars ! Just my 2 cents
 

elkhunter

New Member
Mar 12, 2011
9
0
Thanks everybody for the advice. I'm still not sure what I am going to do. I might wait until I can go to Billings and look at the Cabela's stock. The Zen Rays do look tempting. Does anybody have any more info on them? Thanks again
 

Bitterroot Bulls

Veteran member
Apr 25, 2011
2,326
0
Montana
Elkhunter,

I have received quite a few PMs about the Zens, and I think I will put some notes together and start a thread about them in the next few days.
 

packmule

Veteran member
Jun 21, 2011
2,433
0
TX
Those are Leica's though and they are right up there with the Swaro's....I used a pair of Simmons 10x50's for years, and got by just fine, but the longer I used them, the harder it got to look through them. I just didn't know better back then, nobody I was around was interested in bino's that cost more than $100. Its nice to talk about how clear of a picture the Bino's have and in a store its REAL hard to distinguish any difference between a pair of sub par cheapos and high end Euro's BUT what I didn't know but learned from Mike Eastman in his books and then on my own was that the high end bino's were easier on your eyes !!!

After looking through my simmon's and even my dad's nikons (10x50) I can't look through them for more than about 5 mins and I start getting a headache, the better glass is better for your eyes.. so when someone says wait to get better bino's take their advice, you're eyes will thank you in ten years. personally I'd rather spend less on a tent and all the other gear one needs. Ask yourself "how much time do I spend behind my glasses?" If your looking at deer for a minute or less every hour from a treestand then a cheap pair is probably all you need, but if you spend hours behind your glass out west picking apart drainages you will want good binoculars ! Just my 2 cents
There's a whole lot of truth in that.
 

Skybuster1329

Member
Feb 21, 2011
84
0
50
Oregon City, OR
I got the Meopta Meostars for $825 shipped. From reading the reviews on Cabelas it sounds like they are pretty close to swaros. I live out in BFN so I've not had the chance to look through swaros. But what I've used of these binos I'm happy with them so far.
I'm really happy with mine !! Cabela's Euro. Same thing.
 

huntingheritage

New Member
Jun 16, 2011
9
0
Check out Carson Binos. They are soooo clear and bright. And right on for the price. At the Western Classic in May, a rep had the 10x42's for around $300.
 

Colorado Cowboy

Super Moderator
Jun 8, 2011
8,328
4,713
83
Dolores, Colorado
I have a pair of Nicon 10x35 that are good.....but last year I made the decision to buy a Swaro combo monocular/range finder. I love it. I now only carry one set of optics, not 2 as before. The mono is 8x and crystal clear. The RF goes out to 1000 yds and does a great job too. I only see well out of one eye so it really makes sense for me. The only thing I have found that is a concern is that it uses batteries up pretty fast. I always have spares with me. I am totally satisfied.