He'd gross a lot more than the net as a typical because of the missing tine on the left side. That would cause a lot of deductions in the B&C system that they obviously used because of not being symetrical. If the SCI system was used, he'd be a lot higher. He's still a nice shooter buck unless you have a LQ tag in a big buck unit and wanted to wait a for a real big one.I guess now is when I have to admit I dont know his gross score. At the show I had him scored at they just write the net on the card you fill out when you bring them in and I didnt think to ask what his gross was. His net is 105 1/8.
Maybe for the books, but most people I talk to want to know the gross score.net is all that counts... just sayin
I hear ya. The quality of the deer is all in the eye of the beholder. The score is just a quick judgement tool when sharing a story and a way for friendly competition between some hunters (some may not be so friendly competition).I agree nets are for fishing! I really didnt know much about score when I shot him and really didnt care. Still dont, I can field judge better now but it still comes down to if I like him I go try to get him! I killed him on block management on a general tag in eastern MT in the CMR area in 2006.
LOL I wouldnt say he was slow or obese, he was just a BIG deer! He was starting to rut and had about 20 does and a few small bucks with him.I hear ya. The quality of the deer is all in the eye of the beholder. The score is just a quick judgement tool when sharing a story and a way for friendly competition between some hunters (some may not be so friendly competition).
That is a good ol' buck and I would have felt the same way as you if I passed him up once. Good thing he was old and obese so he couldn't go far from where you first saw him.![]()