Colorado goes to 100% Draw for Nonresident Archery Licenses

Winchester

Veteran member
Mar 27, 2014
2,524
1,905
Woodland Park, Colorado
While considering updates for the 2025-2029 Big Game Season Structure (BGSS) the Colorado Parks & Wildlife (CPW) Commissioners approved their staff's recommendation to limit OTC Archery Licenses (go to 100% draw) for nonresidents only and maintain OTC archery licenses for residents. This motion passed with 9 commissioners in favor and 1 against.

During their May meeting the staff recommended 100% draw for nonresidents and residents, but since then the public input they recieved was so overwhelmingly in favor of keeping OTC licenses for residents that the staff changed its recommendation to 100% draw for nonresidents only.

The commissioners considered OTC Bull Rifle licenses as well, but they approved no change and will keep the status quo for now.
It's worth noting, that a couple of the primary reasons giving for not making any changes today was they haven't had enough public involvement (yet) and they don't want to make too many changes all at once. The implication was they’ll tackle what to do with OTC Rifle licenses during the next BGSS in 5 years.
 

mallardsx2

Veteran member
Jul 8, 2015
3,893
3,191
No major quills from me for taking away my OTC opportunity and making it a draw. Something had to be done for sure. I recognize that.

It should have happened for the residents as well as there is no shortstop plan for the CPW to prevent and manage resident hunters from causing themselves overcrowding. Which makes 0 sense since that's what the entire idea revolves around. To reduce crowding. lol

Haskett had a great idea of making the OTC limited at the DUA level for resident hunters. Unfortunately, that didn't get any traction, mostly because the commissioners are uneducated on the entire subject, and they are acting/voting out of emotion and hearsay.

In my opinion, for now, the pressure will now remain a constant. There will be a TON of archery tags and you will see people who hunt the same unit on the same tag year after year after year. Just like you see in the 700's that went to an archery draw. The only difference this idea is going to make is that it is going to keep the NR's who jump from unit to unit all season long from happening. (Which by the way this isn't very common for a NR to do)

If they would have limited the Residents in this manner, it would have prevented the unit jumping and overcrowding of the better units. This would have spread the hunters R and NR out across the state units evenly. Almost everyone would have drawn a tag and 99% of the hunters would have been happy.

Instead, the resident bowhunter knit and bitch clubs rallied and cried their way to keeping the otc tags to prevent themselves from having to potentially burn their points in the draws. Which, let's face it, is where the real issue lies with residents. lol

Residents could have EASILY drawn a leftover tag for almost any current OTC area in the state. So, to me, the argument for residents to keep OTC Archery is ridiculous if you strictly look at it from the aspect of them being able to get tags. Which was what the majority of them testified to.... "Oooooh... boo hoo hoo... we won't be able to hunt with our kids!" "Save our heritage!" "We won't be able to hunt!" Sobbing and crying while giving testimony, which I thought was utterly ridiculous. But that's what it's come to. Grown men, literally crying, in front of a state wildlife board to get their way. Lord have mercy.

Where things are going to get juicy will be when they make a decision on taking points for choices 1-4. Cant wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimP

Colorado Cowboy

Super Moderator
Jun 8, 2011
8,298
4,661
83
Dolores, Colorado
Let me start by saying that I am not an archery hunter. About 15 years ago I decided I wanted to hunt during the elk rut and experience what all my archery hunting buddies always said was the ultimate elk experience. Hearing a rutting bull and seeing him come to a call close enough to smell him, seemed to me to be something I want to experience. The only way for me to do it and have a chance to take a bull would be to buy a muzzleloader and hunt during muzzleloader season.
I bought a muzzleloader and became proficient enough that I could hunt. I live very close to some very popular units (70,71,72, 73, 74 & 711). I picked 70 because I know it well and spent a lot of time scouting, at least 2 days a week all spring and summer once the snow was gone. I picked a camping spot and knew where I was going to start hunting. For those of you who don't know, the muzzleloader season is during archery season . For the week the gun hunters are allowed to hunt, bow hunters are also hunting.
When I got to the area I chose to camp, it was inundated with archery hunters camps, even a huge military surplus tent that had 18 hunters in it! Every where I went to areas I had scouted, there were camo clad bow hunters. It was the last time I hunted muzzleloader season here in my homestate.
I have hunted in rifle seasons that have unlimited otc rifle elk tags too and don't hunt those unless I am forced to. If I don't draw a tag in the area and season I want, these otc tags at least allow me an opportunity to hunt. I believe that Colorado should not have any unlimited tag units for any hunting......archery or gun seasons. It is not really safe and not the experience I want. All it is to Colorado P&W is $$$$.
 

Winchester

Veteran member
Mar 27, 2014
2,524
1,905
Woodland Park, Colorado
Well said CC. And if you don't want CO to have any unlimited (OTC) tags you may get your wish as the CPW Staff and Commisioners indicated they may take a look at OTC Rifle licenses during the next BGSS in 5 years.

If you'd like to see the facts they considered for OTC Archery tags during this meeting, below is the data the CPW Staff gave to the Commissioners.

Here's the link also: https://cpw.state.co.us/Documents/Commission/2024/June/Item.10_Memo_2025-2029 Big_Game_Season_Structure.pdf

Limitation of OTC Archery Licenses
For various reasons, staff initially recommended full limitation of OTC archery licenses. This recommendation was difficult to make considering it was least supported by resident hunters. From March through May, the Commission and staff listened to the public testimony from many hunters who are passionate about having OTC licenses available to them. Hunters shared their perspectives on hunting heritage, how important OTC licenses are to ensure families and friends can hunt together, about recruitment and retention, and many other reasons to maintain OTC archery licenses for residents. The Commission presented new ideas to accommodate resident hunters in new ways, mainly by managing OTC archery licenses for residents only within a phased-approach for limitation of OTC archery licenses. Since the Commission meeting in March 2024, staff have held numerous internal discussions about all of the feedback received. Staff have come to a new recommendation, which is to limit OTC archery licenses for nonresidents only, and to maintain OTC archery licenses for residents. Unlike rifle, staff believe OTC archery elk licenses should be limited for nonresidents only for the following reasons:

1. There has been an increasing trend in OTC archery license sales (Figure 3) over 20 years. In the early 2000s, the number of OTC archery licenses sales was around 10,000 (~50% resident; ~50% nonresident). From 2014-2019, the number of OTC archery license sales was around 36,000-39,000, with residents getting 58%-51% of the licenses during that period. OTC archery license sales dropped to about 27,000 licenses in 2023 (~47% resident; ~53% nonresident). The limitation of five elk herds during the period 2000-2023 and hunter response to the 2022-2023 severe winter contributed to this drop in OTC license sales.

2. There is a 20-year increasing trend in total archery license sales for elk, which is a combined total of OTC and limited license sales (Figure 4). In 2001, total archery license sales for elk were about 25,000 (53% resident; 47% nonresident). Twenty years later, CPW sold over 20,000 more archery licenses (48% resident; 52% nonresident) than in 2021. Total archery elk license sales have substantially increased during this period, and nonresidents now get a higher proportion of the licenses than residents.

3. Crowding has been a concern during archery season for many years. In 2020, the Commission initiated a phased-approach for limitation of OTC archery licenses. At that time, the Commission allowed archery elk licenses to be limited geographically on a case-by-case basis to meet biological or social management objectives. The Commission did not consider limitation of nonresidents only. Since 2020, resident and nonresident licenses were limited in five different elk herds for biological and social management reasons. CPW has engaged the public on limitation of OTC archery licenses during the last two BGSS processes, which means we have been discussing limitation of archery licenses for over 10 years. The majority of resident hunters prefer to maintain OTC archery elk licenses for residents, and to limit OTC archery elk licenses for nonresidents.

4. Change in demand associated with limitation of OTC licenses is unknown. This is especially true for nonresident hunters. CPW expects nonresident demand to decrease when unlimited OTC licenses are no longer available. We expect to lose nonresident archery hunters following limitation of OTC archery licenses; however, maintaining OTC rifle for both residents and nonresidents (status quo) will likely reduce revenue loss. Many nonresident archery hunters who choose not to apply in the primary draw will still be able to obtain an OTC rifle license as long as we remain status quo for OTC rifle licenses.