Darrin, you are right, cow numbers were down in the 2008 winter survey. But they also noted in the same report that calf recruitment rates were really good, and on the whole the section on the Diamond Creek Zone was pretty positive, I thought. IF&G thinks they can manage it as a trophy zone and keep cow numbers low to appease depredation concerns, as long as calf recruitment remains high, and the habitat continues to be prime.
I'm not arguing with you for the sake of arguing, I'm just discussing how I read the report. I can see how you think it has been managed poorly with all the cow tags. You may have a valid point.
Another problem we have is that we're going off of the 2010 Progress Report, which is pretty old. The 2011 report was due to be out by the end of 2011, but obviously is way over-due. Also, they were unable to do a lot of winter surveys this last year due to a lack of snow. Hopefully we'll have better info next year.
I guess what I'm saying is that when it comes to Unit 66A, there's not even enough elk in there to warrant a winter survey. They summer there, and then head into Unit 66 during the winter. I see it as a very good choice for archery hunters in the early season, and all you have to do is look at the stats for the later Unit 66 rifle season to see that a ton of elk are harvested every year. It is sustaining itself nicely, and I think that's been due to habitat. I get a feel for how the summering herd in 66A is doing by looking at the bloated Unit 66 winter counts.
Plus, the last five year average success rates show that the Diamond Creek Zone is still in the very top places to archery hunt in the state:
The Bottom Line average stats for the last five years:
Unit 66A – 15% success, 41% 6-points or better harvested
Unit 76 – 17% success, 39% 6-points or better harvested
You are certainly right though that 2011 saw a drop in quality bulls harvested. We'll have to wait and see how it looks this year.
Good luck!