6.5 PRC looks Awesome!

HuskyMusky

Veteran member
Nov 29, 2011
1,337
183
IL
always thinking about my next cartridge or what if...

Anyone have any experience with the 6.5 PRC?

How new is this cartridge?

I know the 6.5 creed is already quite popular.

Believe the 6.5 PRC is based on the ruger magnum / RCM case.


I think I need one... Only saw 2 factory loads on midway usa though.

143gr @ 2960 fps. .62 BC

Browning's Hell Canyon chambers the cartridge as well
 

JimP

Administrator
Mar 28, 2016
7,297
8,667
71
Gypsum, Co
I get 3050 out of my 30-06 with a 150 gr Sierra BT. What's the big deal! LOL
New fad, fun round to load and shoot.

I have been toying around with the idea of picking up a new barrel for my TC Contender based on a 6 or 6.5 on the top of a .223 case or even the 7-30 Waters resized to a 6 or 6.5.

Just something about those 6mm's.


That 6.5 PRC would be a fun round but I would forget the factory rounds, it begs to be reloaded for.
 

HuskyMusky

Veteran member
Nov 29, 2011
1,337
183
IL
I get 3050 out of my 30-06 with a 150 gr Sierra BT. What's the big deal! LOL
.62 BC

short action cartridge

I've been looking for something short action to compete with the 270 win, and not the WSM.

supposedly as much energy at 1000yds as 300win mag with 180grs.
 

Tim McCoy

Veteran member
Dec 15, 2014
1,855
4
Oregon
It’s just a bigger engine room than a 6.5CM. Fairly new. The thinking was a bit more velocity than the 6.5CM to easily stay supersonic to/past 1,300 yards, and with the added velocity the small advantage from a slightly shorter TOF. Made for the PRC competition, but now the darling seems to be the 6 CM in the PRC, velocity advantages with less recoil. All that said, the 6.5 PRC is a pretty well balanced offering with lots of hunting potential.
 

tim

Veteran member
Jun 4, 2011
2,417
1,066
north idaho
It’s just a bigger engine room than a 6.5CM. Fairly new. The thinking was a bit more velocity than the 6.5CM to easily stay supersonic to/past 1,300 yards, and with the added velocity the small advantage from a slightly shorter TOF. Made for the PRC competition, but now the darling seems to be the 6 CM in the PRC, velocity advantages with less recoil. All that said, the 6.5 PRC is a pretty well balanced offering with lots of hunting potential.
is the 6.5 prc any better than the 270 wsm?
 

mcseal2

Veteran member
Mar 1, 2011
1,172
196
midwest
It just pushes a higher BC bullet at around 2950fps. The 270WSM will be faster with the same bullet weight but not have the BC. Both are good rounds. I'd bet the PRC is significantly lighter recoiling.

I've taken a lot of game with a 140gr bullet at 2914fps from my 264 win mag. It's a mild load but the gun loves it and it performs well. If I was in the market for a new rifle I'd build a 6.5PRC or buy a Seekins Precision Havak. I just can't make my 264 Maggie feel to cheated on, she decorated my house and I named my second daughter after her.....
 

Tim McCoy

Veteran member
Dec 15, 2014
1,855
4
Oregon
is the 6.5 prc any better than the 270 wsm?
What mcseal2 said. I suppose it would come down to what better means to you. I can envision usages where either would be preferable to the other, but not buy a bunch, unless shooting ultra LR. Both are good hunting rounds.

Now if you were going to order a fast twist barrel for the 270WSM and could find some heavier high BC bullets, it would likely better the PRC at very long range with added recoil and blast, be very close to 7mm Rem Mag then. To 600-700 yards or so it’s one of those splitting hair arguments we tend to have that no animal would notice, in factory form. Much further and the hi BC of the 6.5 separates due to better performance in the wind with many available hi BC bullets, one of the reasons it was made for the competitors.

For me, I shoot to 600 max, don’t handload anymore, so ammo availability would lead me to pick the 270WSM over the 6.5 PRC. If I handloaded, I’d go 6.5 PRC as I hate recoil. I’d be equally confident hunting with either, where bullet placement is key, with a nod to bullet construction.
 
Last edited:

Bonecollector

Veteran member
Mar 9, 2014
5,860
3,664
Ohio
Good discussion guys- I'm learning from this thread.
We never have enough guns, but as was pointed out, it's tough for me to move away from my 7mag with a break. No recoil and I have an excellent BC for long range and a multitude of bullet choices. If you hand-load, I'm finding out that the sky is the limit. Sure we have multiple choices, but the .284/7mag seems to be the sweet spot in calibers.
That said, I'm always looking for my next gun purchase. :cool:
 

Timr245

Very Active Member
Jul 21, 2016
586
400
Northcentral PA
The 6.5s seem to have a perfect balance of bullet weight, SD & BC. The faster you can push it the better IMHO, which is why I opted for the 6.5-300wby. On paper its great. Hopefully I can report on its effectiveness on elk this October haha. Like JimP said, its all just the itch for us to have the shiny new toy to have fun with! I call my good ol’ Remington 788 6mm Hamburger Helper for all the meat its put on the table.
 

mallardsx2

Veteran member
Jul 8, 2015
3,893
3,194
My dads got a 788 in 22-250. Its not pretty...but its a viscous killer..believe that. lol
 

Bonecollector

Veteran member
Mar 9, 2014
5,860
3,664
Ohio
The 6.5s seem to have a perfect balance of bullet weight, SD & BC. The faster you can push it the better IMHO, which is why I opted for the 6.5-300wby. On paper its great. Hopefully I can report on its effectiveness on elk this October haha. Like JimP said, its all just the itch for us to have the shiny new toy to have fun with! I call my good ol’ Remington 788 6mm Hamburger Helper for all the meat its put on the table.
I keep looking at the 6.5-300. Just can't convince myself its that much better than what I'm getting from my 7. Maybe with a little more time I'll persuade myself!
 

mcseal2

Veteran member
Mar 1, 2011
1,172
196
midwest
The old 264 win mag is no slouch either if you want a hot 6.5. My primary one likes that mild load best, but my second one I built for playing at longer range pushes the 143gr ELD-X at 3240fps. It's a special purpose gun at 13.5lbs ready to hunt, but when I need to reach a little it is capable. It is light recoiling at that weight and sure fun to shoot.
 

Tim McCoy

Veteran member
Dec 15, 2014
1,855
4
Oregon
Some random thoughts. There is nothing special or magical about 6.5mm for long range. It just so happens most were made with faster twist barrels to stabilize longer for caliber bullets. Some of the first 6.5’sx54/55etc have been around longer than any of us. Same for the 7mmx57, and some others. Military roots and technology of the day let to heavy bullets being preferred. So with lots of faster twist barrels bullet manufacturers could profitably make heavy for caliber bullets and so it begins. Most 25 and 27 caliber barrels are much slower twist, most are newer designs vs the afore mentioned and made for sporting use. So fewer hi BC bullets are out there, but with a fast twist barrel and hi BC bullets they would be every bit as capable as a 6.5 or 7 way out there ballistically speaking. There are a number of custom bullet makers making these bullets today.

LR shooters imo have largely driven this technology to the point you can get custom barrel twists and hi BC bullets in nearly any caliber now. The 6mm for long range and now 22’s, like the 6mm CM and 224 Valkyrie, give 6.5CM like ballistics with less recoil. They have enough twist to spin 103-108 grain .243 and 90 grain .224 pills. With quicker time to market and lower production costs, pretty much anything can be ordered and shot. One can pick a bullet and order a barrel to shoot it. Good times. For example, I wanted to shoot to 600 for up to elk and be able to kill a Moose closer if I so desired. Ordered a 1 in 9 .284 barrel that happily shoots 140, 145, 160 and 175’s. Could have as easily ordered it in .264 or .308 or...
 

Tim McCoy

Veteran member
Dec 15, 2014
1,855
4
Oregon
I am waiting for the 6.5x378 Weatherby to come out.

Talk about a barrel burner
I seem to recall someone getting 5,000 FPS out of an experimental cartridge, can’t recall where. But that one may get there with light enough bullets and a 48” barrel, lol.
 

Timr245

Very Active Member
Jul 21, 2016
586
400
Northcentral PA
I keep looking at the 6.5-300. Just can't convince myself its that much better than what I'm getting from my 7. Maybe with a little more time I'll persuade myself!
Nah you’re pretty much on track. I dont think I wouldve built the 6.5-300 if I had a 7mm. I almost built a 7mm STW before I bought my 300wby. You’ll never regret having a .284 cal in your arsenal.
 

Bonecollector

Veteran member
Mar 9, 2014
5,860
3,664
Ohio
I seem to recall someone getting 5,000 FPS out of an experimental cartridge, can?t recall where. But that one may get there with light enough bullets and a 48? barrel, lol.
For this very reason is why I work out every morning post in the workout forum!! Bring it on!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

JimP

Administrator
Mar 28, 2016
7,297
8,667
71
Gypsum, Co
If you look at load data for the .30x378 you will see that it will push a 130 gain bullet at close to 3800fps out of a 26" barrel.

Now drop that 130 grain bullet down to a 130 grain 6.5 and I am sure that you could push 4000fps.


The older I get the more fun that I think that one of these type of chamberings would be.