shootbrownelk
Veteran member
The hunting/gun magazines keep saying that hunter numbers are drastically declining. Really? Not from what I've been seeing here in Wyoming the past few years.
Only a guess but us baby boomers are mostly retired and finally have the time & the "means" to make these hunts.The hunting/gun magazines keep saying that hunter numbers are drastically declining. Really? Not from what I've been seeing here in Wyoming the past few years.
I say they go to a happy medium of halfway between the regular and special license price. I will apply for the special draw in a heartbeat to save a few years and get to hunt now, but it's one of the dumbest concepts I've ever heard of. The same product (tag) should not be sold at 2 different prices just so those with a little more money can theoretically jump someone else in line. Any business that tried that would be ridiculed or mocked at best and protested or sued at worst.After hearing all this news about point creep and more applicants I think it's time to raise the NR tag prices and the PP's.
Hate to be like that but if a Kansas whitetail tag is worth $550 and Montana is $639 then we need to be in the $500 range. Aside from the crappy $200 tags (so crappy you can buy 2) in Nebraska Wyoming is the cheapest in the region with tags in the $300 range.
I'm not for gouging but we need to be getting market value for these tags to fund the management side and open up more walk in areas.
This is very true. There are more jobs right now that I have ever seen in my lifetime. People are spending the money right now, thats a fact.Strong economy.
I think they did raise prices a yr or so ago for some of the tags.After hearing all this news about point creep and more applicants I think it's time to raise the NR tag prices and the PP's.
Hate to be like that but if a Kansas whitetail tag is worth $550 and Montana is $639 then we need to be in the $500 range. Aside from the crappy $200 tags (so crappy you can buy 2) in Nebraska Wyoming is the cheapest in the region with tags in the $300 range.
I'm not for gouging but we need to be getting market value for these tags to fund the management side and open up more walk in areas.
WY uses the low price doe/fawn tags to manage the herd numbers, and pricing some of them higher will likely affect the ability to do so. The antelope doe/fawn tags in the unit that I apply for is only has a handful of resident applicants for 250 or so tags, but the number of NR applicants climbs every year and surpasses the tags available. This year will be the 4th time that I've successfully drawn two doe/fawn tags, and only had a buck tag the first year. In a couple years two of us will have the points for a buck tag again. The doe hunt is a fun and affordable way to introduce others to hunting out west.Wyoming seems to be doing an overall great job of wildlife management at their current funding level, and I am not generally supportive of fee increases meant solely to price some hunters out.
One area that I do agree Wyoming is underselling their tags are the reduced price antlerless tags. If a pronghorn buck is worth $350-$600 plus points and fees, a doe tag is worth more than $34. I think a lot of guys just throw in their two doe pronghorn apps because the cost is negligible compared to what they're already shelling out for a Type 1. Also, I love the Type 6 elk tags, but I undoubtedly get more than $300 worth of meat and enjoyment when I do draw one.
That is what I thought about last year 2018 when the tag increases first showed up and the applications jump up. But this year is even worse.One other thought- The increase this year in applications can simply be that many have decided to call it quits on the preference point game and turn them in for any tag. Cost and time to get one may be a factor. An indication of whether that is true may play out over the next 1-2 years, based on how many apply for a tag from that point on.