Scored a great deal on a Vortex Razor HD spotter now I am looking for a quality tripod. Any suggestions?
Those come in a variety of sizes and weights. Which one did you get? Larger scopes need heavier tripods to keep wiggles to a minimum. The Vortex offerings are solid. Pick one with a weight capacity about 50% or more than your scope weight and you have a good starting point.Scored a great deal on a Vortex Razor HD spotter now I am looking for a quality tripod. Any suggestions?
I got the 20-60x85.Those come in a variety of sizes and weights. Which one did you get? Larger scopes need heavier tripods to keep wiggles to a minimum. The Vortex offerings are solid. Pick one with a weight capacity about 50% or more than your scope weight and you have a good starting point.
I like the compactness of the folded xc525c. I also run the Outdoorsman panhead on mine and it is a great setup with an 88mm scope. For lighter weight scopes (or binos only) it is tough to beat Sirui T-025x and T-024x.For the Promaster guys: why do you favor the XC525c over the XC325c? It looks like the 3 section one would be less cumbersome and easier to set up than the 5 section one. It folds down smaller I guess?
The T-025x and T-024x both use a ball head with a separate adjustment for panning only. That's a hard feature to find in a lightweight ballhead.my buddy runs the Siru and I sure like having separate locking tilt and pan adjustments for grid glassing.
The compactness of the 525c can be an advantage, if space is at a premium. It looks like the 3 section weighs the same as the 525c, and has the same load capacity. I have gone to the Suriu VA-5 fluid head. Drastic improvement over the Promaster pan head in every way, but it weighs a few ounces more. The head moves very smoothly and locks in place with no drift.For the Promaster guys: why do you favor the XC525c over the XC325c? It looks like the 3 section one would be less cumbersome and easier to set up than the 5 section one. It folds down smaller I guess?