And the 7-08 isn't exactly a short range gun, I trust mine out to 500. I would go with a light rifle bc if for some reason she decides she doesn't want to hunt much, you'll have a rifle that I'm sure you'll love to carry around with you.
packmule,
I couldn't agree more.
When I was a kid and learning to hunt, the older hunters used 7MM Rem Mags, probably because at one time it was all the rage. When I decided I needed a bigger gun than my .270 to hunt elk, I went with the 7MM Rem Mag. Lucky me. It was after I bought my 7MM Rem Mag that I was given a hand loading set as a Christmas present. That provoked me to start studying calibers, bullets, and ballistics. .284 caliber bullets have excellent sectional densities which translates in to long flight and deep penetration. To get better sectional density, one has to travel far on up the caliber continuum to where big guns that hurt to shoot are found.
As I've delved more in to the science of bullets and ballistics and how animals die, I'm of the opinion that just about anything shooting a .284 caliber bullet will travel a long way and penetrate very deeply resulting in dead animals.
Were I accorded a rifle do-over, I'd buy a .280 Rem & never look back. But there ain't a whole lot of difference between the .280 Rem & 7MM-08 Rem except for 175 grain bullets. And as far as I'm concerned, I could hunt everything in North American with a .284 160 grain Partition. BTW, I really, really like 22" barreled hunting rifles. Give me a 7MM-08 with a short action and a 22" barrel, and I'd hunt elk and moose with it.
One elephant with a 7x57 Mauser and one could argue luck. Nearly a thousand dead elephants and one can easily accept that .284 bullets will penetrate the heck outta anything.