Hello guys.
This is my first post here other than my introduction on the new member section.
Do any of you out there think the cost of banking points has begun to exceed the threshold of feasibility?
I guess I can see 5-6 years of investment being enough to keep in the game and wait a few more seasons. But what about you guys with 10-12 or even more?
I am not the type to be able to justify spending all that money on points for what will never likely be any more of a chance at a real trophy. I see great pictures of bulls, bucks and they many times come out of a general unit.
Sure in a perfect world we might have a better than average shot at a good animal in a limited quota unit. But I have found few if any garenties in hunting, let alone the world.
Maybe some will rethink staying in the points only game. I think even an unsuccessful hunt is better than just buying points for years, dreaming of the perfect trophy you may or may not ever see.
What do some of you think?
Obviously, some general deer units in Wyoming take alot of points. Many can be had with just one or less, though and produce big bucks also for some lucky hunters.
Some wait an awfully long time to finally put in the draw and could have been two or three times out by then.
That seems like alot of missed memories to me.
Sorry for the missed (r) in the word draw of the title.
Hopefully the Grammer police aren't as unforgiving on this site as with some others.
Would love to hear what some have to say on the subject of points banking and it's future.
This is my first post here other than my introduction on the new member section.
Do any of you out there think the cost of banking points has begun to exceed the threshold of feasibility?
I guess I can see 5-6 years of investment being enough to keep in the game and wait a few more seasons. But what about you guys with 10-12 or even more?
I am not the type to be able to justify spending all that money on points for what will never likely be any more of a chance at a real trophy. I see great pictures of bulls, bucks and they many times come out of a general unit.
Sure in a perfect world we might have a better than average shot at a good animal in a limited quota unit. But I have found few if any garenties in hunting, let alone the world.
Maybe some will rethink staying in the points only game. I think even an unsuccessful hunt is better than just buying points for years, dreaming of the perfect trophy you may or may not ever see.
What do some of you think?
Obviously, some general deer units in Wyoming take alot of points. Many can be had with just one or less, though and produce big bucks also for some lucky hunters.
Some wait an awfully long time to finally put in the draw and could have been two or three times out by then.
That seems like alot of missed memories to me.
Sorry for the missed (r) in the word draw of the title.
Hopefully the Grammer police aren't as unforgiving on this site as with some others.
Would love to hear what some have to say on the subject of points banking and it's future.
Last edited: