Reintroducing Wolves to Colorado

Bonecollector

Veteran member
Mar 9, 2014
5,862
3,667
Ohio
I'm NOT for introducing the wolves back into Colorado. They may be there soon enough on their own giving time...
 

kidoggy

Veteran member
Apr 23, 2016
9,847
10,860
58
idaho
they were long ago introduced to Idaho and we have not yet seen a single benefit from having them here.
there are many negatives ,no positives.
I recomend all in colorado to fight against their invasion.
 

shootbrownelk

Veteran member
Apr 11, 2011
1,535
196
Wyoming
they were long ago introduced to Idaho and we have not yet seen a single benefit from having them here.
there are many negatives ,no positives.
I recomend all in colorado to fight against their invasion.
Careful with that anti-wolf tone Kidoggy, Buzz will reply soon.
 

WELDO

New Member
Jan 1, 2016
47
0
I agree with ya kidoggy ! I lived in Salmon 95/96 when they first brought them in. What a joke ! I don't think it was 2 weeks when the first domestic cow calf was killed by one . A bad idea for sure !:(
 

Slugz

Veteran member
Oct 12, 2014
3,664
2,341
55
Casper, Wyoming
Thanks hoshour for starting the thread. I actually had this on my to do list today. Cut and paste below from the RMEF President also that came out yesterday.


RMEF members,

COLORADO ELK ARE IN THE CROSSHAIRS

There is a very real movement going on in Colorado by animal rights and environmental groups to place Colorado’s elk herd in the crosshairs by reintroducing wolves. They refer to such efforts as “great,” “germane to the future of Colorado,” and also state “there’s no profound downside and there’s a real, big upside.”

Those of us who witnessed the wolf reintroduction into the Northern Rocky Mountains could not disagree more! Not only do wolves have a very real and measureable impact on elk and other wildlife but those pro-wolf groups change the rules. Once they have their foot in the door via wolf reintroduction, they move the goalposts by ignoring delisting criteria and filing lawsuit after lawsuit causing populations to grow well over objective.

We saw that in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and the Western Great Lakes. Such litigation began in the 2000’s and lawsuits are still pending today. Wolf populations are currently nearly 500 percent above minimum recovery levels in the Northern Rockies and more than 250 percent above objective in the Western Great Lakes.

Now is the time to raise our voices. Contact your state representatives here and let them know how you feel about any possible wolf reintroduction.

Sincerely,


David Allen
RMEF President & CEO
 

BuzzH

Very Active Member
Apr 15, 2015
909
952
Careful with that anti-wolf tone Kidoggy, Buzz will reply soon.
Not my circus, not my monkeys.

I was deeply involved in the WY/ID/MT wolf issue...time for someone else to step up. I can offer advice, but I'm not going to war again.

Simply not worth it...too much emotion, too little facts and reality.
 

tim

Veteran member
Jun 4, 2011
2,423
1,072
north idaho
the wolves will come, and is it better to be part of it and help with the management or let nature take it's course?

What I have seen is that just like the new economy, if you change your game, you are successful, in hunting where wolves are, you have to change your game to the new way. The guys that can do that, have been susccesful in the wolve states. I know this is not what people want, but it will not be the end of the world. Yes hunting will go down hill for awhile and then it will rebound and there will be some sort of balance. the problem is, it takes about 20 years for that to occur.

I am not saying bring them in. I am saying the wolve will show up eventually anyway.
 

Slugz

Veteran member
Oct 12, 2014
3,664
2,341
55
Casper, Wyoming
the wolves will come, and is it better to be part of it and help with the management or let nature take it's course?

What I have seen is that just like the new economy, if you change your game, you are successful, in hunting where wolves are, you have to change your game to the new way. The guys that can do that, have been susccesful in the wolve states. I know this is not what people want, but it will not be the end of the world. Yes hunting will go down hill for awhile and then it will rebound and there will be some sort of balance. the problem is, it takes about 20 years for that to occur.
I dont disagree with you Tim.....we need though to keep the numbers/pairs in line with the stated programs when they start (min recovery levels and objective numbers)and prevent legislation/lobby groups to change the rules midstream.......I'd rather there would be no reintroduction though to begin with.
 

Prerylyon

Veteran member
Apr 25, 2016
1,334
511
52
Cedar Rapids, IA
We have them in IA now. Two were shot last year by coyote hunters and positively genetically ID'd. It was openly reported by the IA DNR. Its not surprising, back when I bird hunted, we ran into them routinely in Northern WI, where they were thick and spreading. That was over 10 yrs ago. We have the deer to feed them-for now anyway. They likely walked across the frozen Mississippi or just swam across. I hope they open a season for them and manage them as the population grows. I don't see why they need to be "re- introduced". Seems like they are doing it on their own. But like any critter, they should be managed. Just my $0.02.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337Z using Tapatalk
 

MtnBuck

Member
Apr 4, 2016
135
0
Aurora, Colorado
Given the current political landscape of Colorado I wonder what the chances are of this getting pushed through? I would guess that the longer it drags out the less public support it will get from the average citizen as more and more Wolf encounters show up in mass media.
 

kidoggy

Veteran member
Apr 23, 2016
9,847
10,860
58
idaho
doesn't matter if it has public support . unless the public gets out and actively fights against it, it will be pushed through. same as it was in idaho ,wyoming, montana. public was not for it, they just didn't stand against it.

it will cost the state of colorado billions over time with zero positive effects to be offered.
 
Last edited:

Colorado Cowboy

Super Moderator
Jun 8, 2011
8,348
4,741
83
Dolores, Colorado
.

I thought CPW voted if down last January. Guess it doesn't mean politics cant override them though
I meant public vote. But just remember how the wolves got in Wy, Id, Ut & Mt. No vote there by anybody. Under the guise of too many deer, elk & moose and no predators to keep their numbers down (God forbid letting hunters do it!), the feds brought in the wolves to Yellowstone NP by misusing the Endangered Species Act. The NPS is bitching all the time about Rocky Mt NP being over populated with elk (I'm sure that's true), you can bet they could bring in wolves there without any state veto!