Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Field Judging

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Congratulations
    9
    Congratulated 4 Times in 1 Post

    Field Judging

    Hey all,
    Love looking over animals as much as the harvest...
    This is my #2 weaknesses (#1 is hitting them), mostly because of the adrenaline head rush!

    So what's his score?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails IMG_0036[7303].jpg   IMG_0035[7294].jpg  

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to muleyfool For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    57
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
    Congratulations
    67
    Congratulated 100 Times in 8 Posts
    Hard to tell from the pics, but I’d put him in the 170’s. That’s giving him 100” on the frame (inside spread between the beams, main beam length and mass - 100” might be generous), 16” G2’s, 10” g3’s and 12” g4’s. That would make him about 176 plus any extras. That’s my best guess give or take 20”

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Central WI
    Posts
    114
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
    Congratulations
    1
    Congratulated 5 Times in 2 Posts
    Id say in the 160 - 170 range, hard to tell at that distance.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 90 Times in 33 Posts
    Congratulations
    9
    Congratulated 168 Times in 12 Posts
    Like others have said, hard to tell by that one picture but I'd say he's 180"+.

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Eastern Nebraska
    Posts
    2,521
    Thanks
    1,847
    Thanked 1,086 Times in 718 Posts
    Congratulations
    611
    Congratulated 572 Times in 77 Posts
    175"-180" gross would be my guess based on the two pics. He will have significant deductions as his back forks are pretty un-even but I don't really care about net scores. Mass is very tough to gauge in those pics so wouldn't surprise me to see that score change up or down 10".

  7. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Congratulations
    9
    Congratulated 4 Times in 1 Post
    180 is probably close.
    He does have deep pockets. 27”-28” wide. Medium mass.
    He had a 5th on his right G3 makes him look kinda crabby.
    My kids were tagged out that year and I had a different season tag so we didn’t get him on the ground to get an official score.

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    1,001
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 351 Times in 229 Posts
    Congratulations
    14
    Congratulated 213 Times in 48 Posts
    I would guess 160".

    Either way, I would shoot him.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 90 Times in 33 Posts
    Congratulations
    9
    Congratulated 168 Times in 12 Posts
    I only looked at the first picture but after looking at the second one, I think that bucks closer to 170" than 190".Probably in the low to mid 170s.

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Eastern Nebraska
    Posts
    2,521
    Thanks
    1,847
    Thanked 1,086 Times in 718 Posts
    Congratulations
    611
    Congratulated 572 Times in 77 Posts
    I think he is fairly close to this buck I shot last year- gross 175"Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Wyo Muley 2.jpg 
Views:	38 
Size:	97.7 KB 
ID:	21556 Mine may have a bit more height but not quite as wide?

  11. The Following User Says Congratulations to Hilltop For This Post:


  12. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Congratulations
    9
    Congratulated 4 Times in 1 Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilltop View Post
    I think he is fairly close to this buck I shot last year- gross 175"Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Wyo Muley 2.jpg 
Views:	38 
Size:	97.7 KB 
ID:	21556 Mine may have a bit more height but not quite as wide?
    Nice! Love the high backs

 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •