Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Searcy, Arkansas 72143
    Posts
    675
    Thanks
    74
    Thanked 62 Times in 54 Posts
    Congratulations
    2
    Congratulated 1 Time in 1 Post

    Woodtick is right and we should demand and support legislation to defund the anti organizations. Thanks to Congress person Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming for her proposed bill. We should start letting our representatives know how we feel about this.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to xtreme For This Useful Post:


  3. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    674
    Thanks
    162
    Thanked 81 Times in 63 Posts
    Congratulations
    1
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Keep in mind.....this would affect all special interest groups funding. I am all for them finding their own money, but that means organizations the support us that use federal money will also be on their own.

    I know crazy people will have no issue donating to their cause..... But will we the crazy hunters come together for our own causes with as much fury.
    Last edited by wolftalonID; 03-05-2014 at 07:41 AM.
    I hunt because......

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to wolftalonID For This Useful Post:


  5. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    colfax, wa
    Posts
    5,813
    Thanks
    1,499
    Thanked 854 Times in 689 Posts
    Congratulations
    251
    Congratulated 46 Times in 20 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by woodtick View Post
    I think the biggest problem to all of this, is the ability of these special interest groups to sue the feds with tax payers dollars and then recoup the lawyer fee's via the Federal Government. In a nutshell there getting paid by the Federal Government to sue the Federal or State Government. If you think I'm joking look it up, they've been talking about abolishing this law in the House and Senate the last month, but the Lib's are having a royal panty throwing fit over it. We did a big study on it when I was an undergrad in the Natural Resources Dept @ USU, it was insane the amount of money that was being forked out to these special interest groups by us to sue the Fed's.
    1/2 of why they (maybe all of it) sue is for the money they get out of it. Weather it is EAJ money or people they can sell their BS story too that donate money to their "cause" they are getting alot of money out of it. Personally I think they could give a damn less about wolves, elk, moose, spotted owles, or anything else effected by anything they are doing. They are just in it for the money and are very good at selling their story to a bunch of people that dont know anybetter.

    What I think needs to happen is things like wolves need to be decided by the people that are living in and trying to make a living in the areas effected by them and no one else. Why should someone back east thats never even been to Idaho have any say in whats happening in Frank Church?

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Musket Man For This Useful Post:


 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Fish and Game meeting
    By sethkuhl in forum Montana
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-10-2012, 01:13 PM
  2. Just got a call from the NM Game and Fish
    By Codes in forum Antelope
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-06-2011, 08:56 PM
  3. Idaho Fish AND MONEY, I mean GAME
    By MountainMann in forum Idaho
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-29-2011, 08:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •