Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Eastern Nebraska
    Posts
    1,104
    Thanks
    798
    Thanked 371 Times in 267 Posts
    Congratulations
    166
    Congratulated 104 Times in 13 Posts

    257 Weatherby vs 25-06

    I have decided to buy another rifle this summer for myself and my son. Main purpose will be antelope/deer. I was set on a 25-06 but a friend is riding me hard to go with the .257 Weatherby. Anyone have any opinions on this rifle? Ballistics look pretty dang good but I didn't know if there were any negatives to consider with this cartridge. Thanks for any/all feedback.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    302
    Thanks
    88
    Thanked 101 Times in 80 Posts
    Congratulations
    21
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Either is a fine choice. Essentially you get about another 100yards of range from the 257, with more flash bang. Ammo costs are lower and generally more available for the 25-06. You'd probably want a min. 24" tube, 26" probably better on the 257, where the 25-06 works well in a 22", with 24" probably better. Recoil is moderate with either, more a function of stock design and rifle weight, but if all is equal, 257 will give a bit more. I shoot a 25-06 often for deer and antelope and do not hesitate to use it on cow elk. It has taken game cleanly to over 400 yards, with the capability to go further. For me, I'd pick the 25-06 as I would not shoot one further than the other. When I want ultra long range, over 400, I step up to a 6.5mm to 7mm with at least 140-168 grains to keep energy
    up. But if you want to reach way out there with a 25 caliber, the 257 will give you more reach and become the better choice, IMO, for that sort of work. No wrong choice.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Tim McCoy For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Dolores, Colorado
    Posts
    2,884
    Thanks
    275
    Thanked 575 Times in 397 Posts
    Congratulations
    34
    Congratulated 17 Times in 11 Posts
    I own both of them. If I was going to buy and shoot just one, it would be the 26-06. The ballistics aren't that much different, between 150 and 200 fps with the same bullet and it takes a lot more powder to do it in the .257 Wby. I have spent a lot of time working on loads for the Wby and have tried many different powder/bullet combinations. The barrel fouls a lot sooner than the 25-06 and it just doesn't shoot as tight groups as the 25-06. Not a lot of difference, the 25-06 always has shot less than moa and the best I've been able to get out of the Wby is 1.5 to 1.75.

    Rifles are both factory except for glass bedding on both stocks. The 25-06 is the old model M77 Ruger (tang safety) with a 4 x 14 Leupold VXlll. The Weatherby is a MKV with a 3x9 Leupold VXlll. I bought the Ruger new in 1974 and a friend gave me the Wby 3 years ago. It was his Dad's and really needed a lot of work. The barrel took several weeks of scrubbing to get it clean and I glass bedded the stock.

    Both are great guns and you can't go wrong with either caliber. I've loaned my Wby to my best friend, don't know if I'll ever get it back. LOL He keeps trying to buy it, but I tell him "Just go shoot it. You rental fee is backstraps off everything you shoot!"

    I did neglect to say that all I've ever shot in the Wby is reloads. I got 500 pieces of Wby brass with the gun. If I had to buy ammo, then there would be no choice as the Wby stuff is really expensive.
    Last edited by Colorado Cowboy; 02-13-2015 at 12:15 PM.
    Colorado Cowboy
    Cowboy Action Shooter; Endowment Life Member-NRA
    The Original Rocket Scientist-Retired
    "My Father always considered a walk in the mountains as the equivalent of church going."
    Aldous Huxley

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Colorado Cowboy For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    515
    Thanks
    158
    Thanked 97 Times in 86 Posts
    Congratulations
    186
    Congratulated 43 Times in 7 Posts
    For non handloaders the price of Weatherby ammo is crazy. That's the only drawback. Both are excellent calibers.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Gr8bawana For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    896
    Thanks
    253
    Thanked 293 Times in 219 Posts
    Congratulations
    200
    Congratulated 46 Times in 7 Posts
    Both cartridges are perfectly capable for your purpose, the decision to me would be in the cost of ammo/brass/powder vs. minimal gained performance. The 25-06 is simply cheaper to shoot and an antelope/deer would act the same if hit by either one.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to libidilatimmy For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Michigan's Upper Penninsula. South central in Delta Count bordering Menominee County.
    Posts
    137
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 5 Times in 2 Posts
    I've owned both in custom builds. The one I kept is the 25-06. To really reap the benefits of the Weatherby it should have a 26" barrel. I don't like a barrel that long as those extra 2" just seem to make it too long to handle nicely. That and I owned horses and the 26" did not ride right for scabbard use. Given that along with the cost of factory cartridges(or brass) and the extra powder needed to gain a bit more speed, I just did not think it was worth it in the end. Put both cartridges in barrels of equal length and the straight 25-06 isn't too far behind. Mine has a 23" barrel and I can hit 3150fps(110 Accubond) easily with a 23" barrel. I like Tim M will go to a different caliber bigger if I feel the need to hunt something bigger or further than what the .25 will do.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to stevevan For This Useful Post:


  12. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Upper Michigan
    Posts
    49
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
    Congratulations
    8
    Congratulated 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I own both and as the ballistics indicate the 257 wby is superior. That being said I would not be able to afford the ammo if I did not hand load. Ammo is more readily available and affordable for the 25-06 and there are allot more choice in factory ammo for the 25-06 than the 257. But the good news is you will not be disappointed with the performance of either one if you use quality ammo. I would not recommend using cheap 100 grn bullets on deer with the 25-06, I have tracked lots of deer for my father in law that were hit decent but with crappy ammo that blew up on impact with the 25-06.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to dan maule For This Useful Post:


  14. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Dover, Tennessee
    Posts
    506
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 110 Times in 103 Posts
    Congratulations
    49
    Congratulated 16 Times in 4 Posts
    I have shot the .257 and liked it, but never owned one, I do own a 25-06 . Browning A-Bolt and have killed Mule Deer, Antelope and Whitetail and love it.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to CrossCreeks For This Useful Post:


  16. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Eastern Nebraska
    Posts
    1,104
    Thanks
    798
    Thanked 371 Times in 267 Posts
    Congratulations
    166
    Congratulated 104 Times in 13 Posts
    Thanks for the responses guys. My research shows about $10-$12 a box difference in the Hornady ammo I typically shoot. For me that is about $50- $100.00 a year as I may shoot 5-10 boxes throughout the year through each rifle. The cost difference to me isn't a deciding factor. Other mentions of barrel length may be. If I understand right the 25-06 "should have" a 24" barrel for optimal performance and the 257 should have a 26". I honestly have never owner a rifle with longer than a 22" barrel. I think I will have to go hold one to see and feel the difference. On paper the big advantage appears to be about 75 yards longer point blank range. The 257 appears to be flat enough to have a PBR of 400 yards where the 25-06 is about 325 PBR. Again thanks guys- time to go take them for a test drive.

  17. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Western Montana
    Posts
    485
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 75 Times in 55 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 9 Times in 5 Posts
    For all the reasons stated I too would go with the 25-06. I have one in a Remington Mountain rifle with the .22 inch barrel and it is a great cartridge. I do wish it had the 24" barrel, but it works fine. My load with 120 gr. Partitions chronographs exactly at 3000 fps. That's a great bullet for anything I want to shoot with that rifle. I have used it to take a couple of elk with. I shot a spike bull at about 350 yards and I let a young hunter use it on his first big-game animal ever which was a nice fat cow elk. He drilled her one time at 250 yards and she went about 30 yards and dropped. The 25-06 is a great round and a good choice for what you plan with it.
    NRA Life Member
    RMEF
    Montana Wild Sheep Foundation
    Boone & Crockett Club
    Montana Bow Hunters Association

    "One loves to possess arms though they hope never to."
    Thomas Jefferson

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to 6mm Remington For This Useful Post:


 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •