Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 21 Times in 18 Posts
    Congratulations
    2
    Congratulated 10 Times in 1 Post

    http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/DM_west.htm

    every time I check it's a drought... perhaps moisture will change things, mild winter+moisture would be awesome, but if drought continues, would be a bad year I think.

  2. #22
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Reno Nv
    Posts
    5,364
    Thanks
    1,849
    Thanked 952 Times in 666 Posts
    Congratulations
    400
    Congratulated 303 Times in 47 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by HuskyMusky View Post
    http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/DM_west.htm

    every time I check it's a drought... perhaps moisture will change things, mild winter+moisture would be awesome, but if drought continues, would be a bad year I think.
    We were officially out if the drought last year. But I agree if we don't get good snow pack it won't take long to be rite back in one again

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    colfax, wa
    Posts
    6,176
    Thanks
    1,737
    Thanked 996 Times in 786 Posts
    Congratulations
    437
    Congratulated 108 Times in 30 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by hardstalk View Post
    Imo its not the states job to manage for quality as much as it is the hunters responsibility. If the state focuses on quantity its the sportsmans job to focus on quality. Forkys don't get to be smart brutes if there taken by a part time road hunter Just their to fill a tag. I personally feel nv has been a bit rough on the deer herds the past several years by upping the numbers but I'm hoping their new tags (silver state) and raffle tags they have implemented make up for the reason behind the tag number jump.
    Not saying i disagree with you but there are tomany hunters that just want to shoot the first legal deer they see. I wish more states would put in more 3 and 4 point minimums in more areas.

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    110
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    Congratulations
    6
    Congratulated 27 Times in 6 Posts
    I guess I don't see a problem with a hunter wanting to fill his/her tag with a freezer filler. Everyone has a different approach to their hunting objectives just the same as we may hunt differently. It's their tag, who am I to say how they are to fill it.
    "Make no mistake, it's not revenge he's after ... It's the reckoning." Doc Holliday

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    vegas
    Posts
    1,440
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked 214 Times in 148 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 103 Times in 11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Musket Man View Post
    Not saying i disagree with you but there are tomany hunters that just want to shoot the first legal deer they see. I wish more states would put in more 3 and 4 point minimums in more areas.
    I would love to see that happen it wouldn't have to happen state wide but every state could have their own "strip" if this were implemented. Just a couple of units managed by state and sportsman alike with an age goal in mind for harvest.

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 21 Times in 18 Posts
    Congratulations
    2
    Congratulated 10 Times in 1 Post

    it would be interesting to see a checker board of management with say white squares being trophy squares and black squares being for quantity.

    I recently read that 4 units in CO for elk are managed for trophy elk, no surprise those are the toughest to draw!

    as to point restrictions, I'd rather see a guy shoot a spike bull than a 3x3 or 4x4, a 3 or 4yo bull is much closer to being a big bull than a 1yo is.

    Also when a guy can't shoot a management bull, ie an older bull with only a 3x3 or 4x4 frame then you're encouraging inferior genetics.

    oh well this mystery will probably never be solved/fixed in my lifetime, so all a trophy hunter can do is hunt quality areas/units, wait for tags and hunt hard when they have that chance, or pass inferior bulls in their opinion.

    I hate the term "if i don't shoot it my neighbor will, or someone else will" well if you shoot a small bull then certainly it won't make it til next year. and why would any hunter let another hunter influence their decision whether or not a bull is big enough.

    If I want a 6x6, and I see a 5x5 I know another hunter would gladly shoot, that doesn't make me want to shoot a 5x5 any more. I'd rather pass on that 5x5 and let anther hunter who would love a 5x5 take him, than to take a 5x5 because someone else would and be disappointed it was a 5x5 and not a 6x6.

    Never settle.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Nevada big game results for 2014
    By Ikeepitcold in forum Nevada
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 05-23-2014, 11:15 AM
  2. nevada application process question.
    By 4corn in forum Nevada
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-01-2014, 08:06 PM
  3. 2013 Online Application is now open
    By Ikeepitcold in forum Nevada
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 04-01-2013, 01:35 PM
  4. 2013 Wyoming Application Information Is Online
    By Umpqua Hunter in forum Wyoming
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-15-2012, 11:06 AM
  5. 2011 Big Game Hunting Digest online now
    By twp1224 in forum Other
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-26-2011, 04:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •