Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    476
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 108 Times in 72 Posts
    Congratulations
    2
    Congratulated 135 Times in 10 Posts

    WY Outfitters Want More NR Elk Tags

    Basically the Outfitters want more tags for their hunting areas especially in wilderness areas. As a resident I feel it should stay status quo. What are your thoughts!

    https://www.usnews.com/news/best-sta...es-to-elk-tags

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Reno Nv
    Posts
    7,410
    Thanks
    2,674
    Thanked 1,607 Times in 1,124 Posts
    Congratulations
    707
    Congratulated 710 Times in 118 Posts
    As a non res I agree with you.
    ... because every picture tells a story

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Casper, Wyoming
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 9 Times in 4 Posts
    I am against this proposal and encourage all residents to attend the meetings for this next year. WYOGA is using increased elk numbers statewide to push for more bull tags in general areas and 4% more nonresident tags in limited quota areas. Only one general area in Wyoming has a high bull/cow ratio and it is predominantly private land. I do believe the answer to over objective elk herds in any area is more access to kill cow elk, not increased harvest of bulls.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to JM77 For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Casper Wy
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
    Congratulations
    5
    Congratulated 2 Times in 2 Posts
    JM77 when will the meeting begin next year.. And will they have a comment period online for this?

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    501
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 138 Times in 104 Posts
    Congratulations
    12
    Congratulated 27 Times in 9 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ikeepitcold View Post
    As a non res I agree with you.
    As a non resident I also disagree with this. I believe outfitters are a big part of the growing problem of public hunting in the U.S., and I don't like the idea of one group getting preference over another
    Live to hunt, hunt to live.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to CrimsonArrow For This Useful Post:


  8. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    702
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 240 Times in 155 Posts
    Congratulations
    1
    Congratulated 140 Times in 32 Posts
    They only want more NR tags so they can guide NR in the wilderness areas because they know we are screwed without them due to stupid laws preventing us from hunting there.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mallardsx2 For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    598
    Thanks
    220
    Thanked 233 Times in 168 Posts
    Congratulations
    429
    Congratulated 36 Times in 14 Posts
    Eliminating the outfitter wilderness rule would increase NR opportunity, w/o the need to increase tags. Problem solved.....

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to 480/277 For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Casper, Wyoming
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
    Congratulations
    0
    Congratulated 9 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Conrad8899 View Post
    JM77 when will the meeting begin next year.. And will they have a comment period online for this?
    Meetings will be after the season setting process in 2018, late spring I would imagine.

    Jeff

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to JM77 For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Eastern Nebraska
    Posts
    2,330
    Thanks
    1,709
    Thanked 954 Times in 646 Posts
    Congratulations
    590
    Congratulated 492 Times in 64 Posts
    I have lived on all sides of this issue. I was a resident guide/hunter and now am a non-resident who likes to hunt in Wyoming. I understand where the outfitters are coming from- As a guide/outfitter, it is frustrating to not have your hunters draw year after year and struggle just to book enough to pay leases. In the end, we gave up the area 7 leases we had and eventually stopped guiding all together. The ranches we had leased are now leased by a small group of very rich doctors. For the primarily private land LQ areas I wouldn't have an issue with higher non-resident allocation. The average Joe doesn't get to hunt there anyway. As far as General hunt areas go, I believe we have more than enough hunters in the National Forests. Competition is already high and success rates aren't great. I see no reason to add to the mayhem.

  15. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,049
    Thanks
    998
    Thanked 665 Times in 544 Posts
    Congratulations
    550
    Congratulated 159 Times in 53 Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by 480/277 View Post
    Eliminating the outfitter wilderness rule would increase NR opportunity, w/o the need to increase tags. Problem solved.....
    Now we have some real dialogue 480. I couldn't agree more!

 

 
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •